IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1256-e1274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence: An integrative literature review and synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Jørghild Karlotte Jensen
  • Randi Skår
  • Bodil Tveit

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe, interpret and synthesise the current research findings on the impact of the Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence in identifying and managing deteriorating patients in general hospital wards. Background As patient safety initiatives designed to ensure the early identification and management of deteriorating patients, the Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems have broad appeal. However, it is still unclear how these systems impact nurses’ competence when these systems are used in general hospital wards. Methods CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Articles were appraised, a thematic analysis was conducted, and similar and divergent perspectives on emergent themes and subthemes were extracted by a team of researchers. Results Thirty‐six studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis of findings showed how the Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems impacted three competence areas: (i) Nurses’ competence in assessing and caring for patients related to the subthemes: (a) sensing clinical deterioration and (b) the development of skills and knowledge. (ii). Nurses’ competence in referring patients, related to the subthemes: (a) deciding whether to summon help and (b) the language and communication lines in the referral process. (ii) Nurses’ coping and mastery experiences. Conclusion The impact of the Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence in identifying and managing deteriorating patients is beneficial but also somewhat contradictory. Relevance to clinical practice A greater understanding of nurses’ development of competence when using the Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems will facilitate the design of implementation strategies and the use of these systems to improve practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2018. "The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence: An integrative literature review and synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1256-1274, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1256-e1274
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14239
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janice E Rattray & William Lauder & Ruth Ludwick & Carolyn Johnstone & Richard Zeller & Janice Winchell & Elizabeth Myers & Anne Smith, 2011. "Indicators of acute deterioration in adult patients nursed in acute wards: a factorial survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 723-732, March.
    2. Kim S Astroth & Wendy M Woith & Stephen J Stapleton & R Joseph Degitz & Sheryl H Jenkins, 2013. "Qualitative exploration of nurses' decisions to activate rapid response teams," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2876-2882, October.
    3. Debbie Massey & Leanne M Aitken & Wendy Chaboyer, 2010. "Literature review: do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3260-3273, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zexian Zeng & Zhenghao Fan & Xiaolei Xie & Colleen H. Swartz & Paul DePriest & Jingshan Li, 2020. "A two-level iteration approach for modeling and analysis of rapid response process with multiple deteriorating patients," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 35-71, March.
    2. Gooske Douw & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Arthur R H van Zanten & Johannes G van der Hoeven & Lisette Schoonhoven, 2017. "Capturing early signs of deterioration: the dutch‐early‐nurse‐worry‐indicator‐score and its value in the Rapid Response System," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2605-2613, September.
    3. Doug Elliott & Emily Allen & Sharon McKinley & Lin Perry & Christine Duffield & Margaret Fry & Robyn Gallagher & Rick Iedema & Michael Roche, 2016. "User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2211-2222, August.
    4. Mandy Odell, 2015. "Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 173-182, January.
    5. Pary M Azize & Allegra Cattani & Ruth Endacott, 2018. "Perceived language proficiency and pain assessment by registered and student nurses in native English‐speaking and EAL children aged 4–7 years," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1081-1093, March.
    6. Emily Allen & Doug Elliott & Debra Jackson, 2017. "Recognising and responding to in‐hospital clinical deterioration: An integrative review of interprofessional practice issues," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3990-4012, December.
    7. Julie Considine & Carissa Trotter & Judy Currey, 2016. "Nurses' documentation of physiological observations in three acute care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 134-143, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1256-e1274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.