IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i23-24p3260-3273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Literature review: do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?

Author

Listed:
  • Debbie Massey
  • Leanne M Aitken
  • Wendy Chaboyer

Abstract

Aims. To conduct a literature review that explores the impact of rapid response systems on reducing major adverse events experienced by deteriorating ward patients. Background. Patients located on hospitals wards are frequently older, have multiple co‐morbidities and are often at risk of life‐threatening clinical deterioration. Rapid response systems have been developed and implemented to provide appropriate and timely intervention to these patients. Design. A comprehensive review of the literature. Methods. This review used the rapid response systems framework recently developed by experts in the area. Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1995–June 2009. Sixteen papers were selected that most clearly reflected the research aim. Each paper was critically appraised and systematically assessed. Major themes and findings were identified for each of the studies. Results. The effectiveness of rapid response systems in reducing major adverse events in deteriorating ward patients remains inconclusive. Six studies demonstrated that the introduction of a rapid response systems positively impacted on patient outcomes, but three studies demonstrated no positive impact on patient outcomes. Nursing staff appear reluctant to use rapid response systems; the rationale for this is unclear. However, the continued underuse and inactivation may be one reason why research findings evaluating rapid response systems have been inconclusive. Conclusions. The paper illustrates two important gaps in the literature. First, ‘ramp‐up’ systems have not been subjected to formal evaluation. Second, rapid response systems are under‐activated and underused by nursing staff. There is an urgent need to explore the reasons for this and to identify interventions to improve the activation of these systems in an effort to promote safe and effective care to the deteriorating ward patient. Relevance to clinical practice. Rapid response systems are multidimensional models. They are relatively new innovations that have important implications for clinical research and implementation policy. This review contributes to the emerging debate on rapid response systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Debbie Massey & Leanne M Aitken & Wendy Chaboyer, 2010. "Literature review: do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3260-3273, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3260-3273
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zexian Zeng & Zhenghao Fan & Xiaolei Xie & Colleen H. Swartz & Paul DePriest & Jingshan Li, 2020. "A two-level iteration approach for modeling and analysis of rapid response process with multiple deteriorating patients," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 35-71, March.
    2. Mandy Odell, 2015. "Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 173-182, January.
    3. Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2018. "The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence: An integrative literature review and synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1256-1274, April.
    4. Julie Considine & Carissa Trotter & Judy Currey, 2016. "Nurses' documentation of physiological observations in three acute care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 134-143, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3260-3273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.