IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p4089-4099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Digby
  • Danielle Bolster
  • Andrew Perta
  • Tracey K Bucknall

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore allied health staff perceptions on the role of nurses in subacute care wards. Background A consequence of earlier discharge from acute hospitals is higher acuity of patients in subacute care. The impact on nurses’ roles and required skill mix remains unknown. In the same way, nurses’ integration into the rehabilitation team is ambiguous. Design Descriptive qualitative inquiry. Methods Semistructured interviews conducted with 14 allied health staff from one subacute care facility in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis using the framework approach. Results Three main themes were evident: (a) the changing context of care: patient acuity, rapid patient discharge and out‐dated buildings influenced care; (b) generalist as opposed to specialist rehabilitation nurses: a divide between traditional nursing roles of clinical and personal care and a specialist rehabilitation role; and (c) interdisciplinary relations and communication demonstrated lack of respect for nurses and integrating holistic care into everyday routines. Conclusions Allied health staff had limited understanding of nurses’ role in subacute care, and expectations varied. Power relationships appeared to hamper teamwork. Failure to include nurses in team discussions and decision‐making could hinder patient outcomes. Progressing patients to levels of independence involves both integrating rehabilitation into activities of daily living with nurses and therapy‐based sessions. Promotion of the incorporation of nursing input into patient rehabilitation is needed with both nurses and allied health staff. Relevance to clinical practice Lack of understanding of the nurses’ role contributes to lack of respect for the nursing contribution to rehabilitation. Nurses have a key role in rehabilitation sometimes impeded by poor teamwork with allied health staff. Processes in subacute care wards need examination to facilitate more effective team practices inclusive of nurses. Progressing patients’ independence in rehabilitation units involves activities of daily living with nurses as much as therapy‐based sessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Andrew Perta & Tracey K Bucknall, 2018. "The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4089-4099, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4089-4099
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mia I Loft & Ingrid Poulsen & Bente A Esbensen & Helle K Iversen & Lone L Mathiesen & Bente Martinsen, 2017. "Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4905-4914, December.
    2. David J Clarke, 2014. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta‐ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1201-1226, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xianmei Meng & Xuemei Chen & Zhihui Liu & Lanshu Zhou, 2020. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Perspectives from multi‐disciplinary healthcare professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, March.
    2. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Leanne Hughes & Andrew Perta & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Examining subacute nurses’ roles in a changing healthcare context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2260-2274, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Leanne Hughes & Andrew Perta & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Examining subacute nurses’ roles in a changing healthcare context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2260-2274, July.
    2. Xianmei Meng & Xuemei Chen & Zhihui Liu & Lanshu Zhou, 2020. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Perspectives from multi‐disciplinary healthcare professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, March.
    3. Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura & Cássia Milena Freitas Machado Sousa & Jessica Aparecida Biscaro & Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Silva & Juliany Lino Gomes Silva & Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconce, 2021. "Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses Related to Self-Care Deficits in Patients with Stroke," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(4), pages 494-501, May.
    4. Mia I Loft & Ingrid Poulsen & Bente A Esbensen & Helle K Iversen & Lone L Mathiesen & Bente Martinsen, 2017. "Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4905-4914, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4089-4099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.