IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v30y2021i4p494-501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses Related to Self-Care Deficits in Patients with Stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura
  • Cássia Milena Freitas Machado Sousa
  • Jessica Aparecida Biscaro
  • Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Silva
  • Juliany Lino Gomes Silva
  • Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais
  • Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes

Abstract

To clinically validate the defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses related to self-care deficits in feeding, bathing, toileting, and dressing in patients with stroke. A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted with a sample of 135 patients with stroke. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the latent class analysis method using the random effects model. The prevalence of diagnoses was 23.5% for Bathing self-care deficit, 18.5% for Dressing self-care deficit, 13.3% for Toileting self-care deficit, and 7.5% for Feeding self-care deficit. Fourteen defining characteristics were sensitive, and 17 were specific. Hemorrhagic stroke and note 4 on the Rankin scale was associated with self-care deficits. Of the 37 defining characteristics of the four diagnoses studied, 19 were clinically validated according to the latent class analysis model. These most accurate clinical indicators contribute to the development of the care plan for patients with stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura & Cássia Milena Freitas Machado Sousa & Jessica Aparecida Biscaro & Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Silva & Juliany Lino Gomes Silva & Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconce, 2021. "Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses Related to Self-Care Deficits in Patients with Stroke," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(4), pages 494-501, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:494-501
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773819883352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773819883352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773819883352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mia I Loft & Ingrid Poulsen & Bente A Esbensen & Helle K Iversen & Lone L Mathiesen & Bente Martinsen, 2017. "Nurses’ and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4905-4914, December.
    2. Teresa Connolly & Ellen Mahoney, 2018. "Stroke survivors’ experiences transitioning from hospital to home," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3979-3987, November.
    3. Huiying Liu & Vivian W. Q. Lou, 2019. "Functional recovery of older stroke patients discharged from hospital to home: The effects of cognitive status and different levels of therapy intensity," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 47-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Leanne Hughes & Andrew Perta & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Examining subacute nurses’ roles in a changing healthcare context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2260-2274, July.
    2. Robin Digby & Danielle Bolster & Andrew Perta & Tracey K Bucknall, 2018. "The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4089-4099, November.
    3. Xianmei Meng & Xuemei Chen & Zhihui Liu & Lanshu Zhou, 2020. "Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Perspectives from multi‐disciplinary healthcare professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 28-37, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:494-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.