IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p3900-3912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing clinical uncertainty: An ethnographic study of the impact of critical care outreach on end‐of‐life transitions in ward‐based critically ill patients with a life‐limiting illness

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Pattison
  • Jude Mclellan
  • Lara Roskelly
  • Kirsty McLeod
  • Theresa Wiseman

Abstract

Rapid response teams, such as critical care outreach teams, have prominent roles in managing end‐of‐life transitions in critical illness, often questioning appropriateness of treatment escalation. Clinical uncertainty presents clinicians with dilemmas in how and when to escalate or de‐escalate treatment. Aims and objectives To explore how critical care outreach team decision‐making processes affect the management of transition points for critically ill, ward‐based patients with a life‐limiting illness. Methods An ethnographic study across two hospitals observed transition points and decisions to de‐escalate treatment, through the lens of critical care outreach. In‐depth interviews were carried out to elucidate rationales for practices witnessed in observations. Detailed field notes were taken and placed in a descriptive account. Ethnographic data were analysed, categorised and organised into themes using thematic analysis. Findings Data were collected over 74 weeks, encompassing 32 observation periods with 20 staff, totalling more than 150 hr. Ten formal staff interviews and 20 informal staff interviews were undertaken. Three main themes emerged: early decision‐making and the role of critical care outreach; communicating end‐of‐life transitions; end‐of‐life care and the input of critical care outreach. Findings suggest there is a negotiation to achieve smooth transitions for individual patients, between critical care outreach, and parent or ward medical teams. This process of negotiation is subject to many factors that either hinder or facilitate timely transitions. Conclusions Critical care outreach teams have an important role in shared decision‐making. Associated emotional costs relate to conflict with parent medical teams, and working as lone practitioners. The cultural contexts in which teams work have a significant effect on their interactions and agency. Relevance to practice There needs to be a cultural shift towards early and open discussion of treatment goals and limitations of medical treatment, particularly when facing serious illness. With training and competencies, outreach nurses are well placed to facilitate these discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Pattison & Jude Mclellan & Lara Roskelly & Kirsty McLeod & Theresa Wiseman, 2018. "Managing clinical uncertainty: An ethnographic study of the impact of critical care outreach on end‐of‐life transitions in ward‐based critically ill patients with a life‐limiting illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3900-3912, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3900-3912
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Geest, Sjaak & Finkler, Kaja, 2004. "Hospital ethnography: introduction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(10), pages 1995-2001, November.
    2. Slomka, Jacquelyn, 1992. "The negotiation of death: Clinical decision making at the end of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 251-259, August.
    3. Murphy, Elizabeth & Dingwall, Robert, 2007. "Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2223-2234, December.
    4. Seymour, Jane Elizabeth, 2000. "Negotiating natural death in intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 1241-1252, October.
    5. Seymour, Jane Elizabeth, 1999. "Revisiting medicalisation and 'natural' death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 691-704, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aita, Kaoruko & Kai, Ichiro, 2010. "Physicians' psychosocial barriers to different modes of withdrawal of life support in critical care: A qualitative study in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 616-622, February.
    2. Iedema, Rick & Sorensen, Roslyn & Braithwaite, Jeffrey & Flabouris, Arthas & Turnbull, Liz, 2005. "The teleo-affective limits of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 845-857, February.
    3. Biswas, Debashish & Hossin, Raduan & Rahman, Mahbubur & Bardosh, Kevin Louis & Watt, Melissa H. & Zion, Mazharul Islam & Sujon, Hasnat & Rashid, Md Mahbubur & Salimuzzaman, M. & Flora, Meerjady S. & Q, 2020. "An ethnographic exploration of diarrheal disease management in public hospitals in Bangladesh: From problems to solutions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Topo, Päivi & Iltanen-Tähkävuori, Sonja, 2010. "Scripting patienthood with patient clothing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1682-1689, June.
    5. Kapil Babu Dahal, 2022. "Engrained with modernity: commodification, medicalisation, and cross-border medical travel for health care in Nepal," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Carmel, Simon, 2006. "Health care practices, professions and perspectives: A case study in intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 2079-2090, April.
    7. Salhi, Bisan A., 2020. "Who are Clive's friends? Latent sociality in the emergency department," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Marie-Astrid Le Theule & Caroline Lambert & Jérémy Morales, 2017. "Accompanying death, organising the end of life [Accompagner la mort, organiser la fin de vie]," Post-Print hal-03654015, HAL.
    9. Varley, Emma, 2010. "Targeted doctors, missing patients: Obstetric health services and sectarian conflict in Northern Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 61-70, January.
    10. Evans, Joshua D. & Crooks, Valorie A. & Kingsbury, Paul T., 2009. "Theoretical injections: On the therapeutic aesthetics of medical spaces," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 716-721, September.
    11. Swallow, Julia, 2017. "Expectant futures and an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Knowing and its consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 57-64.
    12. Guta, Adrian & Nixon, Stephanie A. & Wilson, Michael G., 2013. "Resisting the seduction of “ethics creep”: Using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 301-310.
    13. Maslen, Sarah & Harris, Anna, 2021. "Becoming a diagnostic agent: A collated ethnography of digital-sensory work in caregiving intra-actions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    14. Lange, Isabelle L. & Kanhonou, Lydie & Goufodji, Sourou & Ronsmans, Carine & Filippi, Véronique, 2016. "The costs of ‘free’: Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-62.
    15. Long, Tracy & Sque, Magi & Addington-Hall, Julia, 2008. "Conflict rationalisation: How family members cope with a diagnosis of brain stem death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 253-261, July.
    16. Gross, Sky, 2009. "Experts and 'knowledge that counts': A study into the world of brain cancer diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1819-1826, December.
    17. Lang, Alexander, 2020. "The good death and the institutionalisation of dying: An interpretive analysis of the Austrian discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    18. Janet Boddy, 2014. "Research across cultures, within countries: Hidden ethics tensions in research with children and families?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 14(1), pages 91-103, January.
    19. Skovgaard, Anna Louise & Jørgensen, Marianne Johansson & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine & Høybye, Mette Terp, 2022. "Discharge readiness as an infrastructure: Negotiating the transfer of care for elderly patients in medical wards," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    20. Chabrol, Fanny & David, Pierre-Marie & Krikorian, Gaëlle, 2017. "Rationing hepatitis C treatment in the context of austerity policies in France and Cameroon: A transnational perspective on the pharmaceuticalization of healthcare systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 243-250.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3900-3912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.