IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p3882-3893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In their shoes: An ontological perspective on empathy in nursing practice

Author

Listed:
  • John McKinnon

Abstract

Aims and objectives To present an enquiry into empathy as part of nursing ontology. The work aims to improve understanding of how empathy is developed and used in practice. Background Empathy is the ability to grasp the frame of reference of another. As such, empathy is a key feature of nursing practice involving self‐awareness and the use of emotion in interpersonal understanding. Method As part of a larger study into the commonality of emotion in nursing, thirty‐three nurses across a range of settings talked exhaustively about their experiences with empathy in the context of their relationships with service users. The interviews were audio‐taped and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analysed using Grounded Theory Method. Results Empathy was experienced as a libidinal entity motivating care dependent on a number of allied skills which formed a process: listening and echoing, knowing another's circumstances, imagining and representing the imagined perception within the self. Empathy was viewed as a tool for person‐centred care with two distinct levels: phenomena related and biography related. Sensitivity to care context in the use of nurses’ life experience also enabled empathy in an emotional kinship. Person‐centred care and empowerment were inhibited where empathy could not be achieved. Discussion The findings confirm the place of empathy in the hierarchy of embodied nursing skills and add to the current bank of knowledge on the sharing of emotions and the value of emotion to professional judgement. Conclusion Empathy is a tool with which to ascertain the cognitive and emotional perspective of others. Empathy's libidinal properties mean that shared understanding enhances care. Emotional kinship means that life experience can be harnessed for empathy in practice. Relevance to clinical practice Insight into the ontology of empathy provides a basis for the construction of teaching tools and learning objects for character and skill development in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • John McKinnon, 2018. "In their shoes: An ontological perspective on empathy in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3882-3893, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3882-3893
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angelie Pearl A. Bongbong & Raphy B. Labad & Lei Pauline L. Rule & Howard G. Sumayang & Teopisto Y. Culanag Jr. & Jose F. Cuevas Jr., 2023. "Managing Children at the Bahay PAG-ASA: Experiences of the Personnel Handling Varied In-House Personalities," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 720-730, June.
    2. África Martos Martínez & María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & María del Mar Molero Jurado & María del Mar Simón Márquez & Ana Belén Barragán Martín & José Jesús Gázquez Linares, 2021. "Empathy, Affect and Personality as Predictors of Engagement in Nursing Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Tracy Levett‐Jones & Robyn Cant, 2020. "The empathy continuum: An evidenced‐based teaching model derived from an integrative review of contemporary nursing literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1026-1040, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3882-3893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.