IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p2974-2983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation of evidence‐based guideline recommendations to address urinary incontinence in nursing home residents according to the ADAPTE‐process

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Hoedl
  • Daniela Schoberer
  • Ruud J. G. Halfens
  • Christa Lohrmann

Abstract

Aims and objectives To adapt international guideline recommendations for the conservative management of urinary incontinence (UI), defined as any involuntary loss of urine, in Austrian nursing home residents following the ADAPTE‐process. Background Many international guidelines for managing UI are available. Nevertheless, the international recommendations have not yet been adapted to address the Austrian nursing home context. This crucial adaptation process will enhance the acceptance and applicability of the recommendations as well as encourage adherence among Austrian nurses and nursing home residents. Design This study is a methodological study based on the ADAPTE‐process, including a systematic search, quality appraisal of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument as well as an external review by means of a Delphi technique. The guidelines had to be topic‐relevant, published within the last 3 years and achieve a rigor of development score of 80% using the AGREE II instrument. Methods We searched international guideline databases to identify adequate guidelines. Two raters assessed the quality of each guideline, ascertaining that it fulfilled the inclusion criteria using the AGREE II instrument. We translated the identified recommendations into German and externally reviewed for their applicability in the Austrian context. Results We identified 1,612 hits in 10 databases. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we assessed five international clinical guidelines for quality using the AGREE II instrument. One clinical guideline fulfilled the inclusion criteria. This clinical guideline contains 116 recommendations, of which 29 were applicable in the Austrian nursing home setting. Conclusion We identified only one suitable guideline, possibly due to the stringent nature of the inclusion criteria. However, following low‐quality guidelines may result in the use of recommendations that are not based on evidence and, therefore, may lead to suboptimal nursing care and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Hoedl & Daniela Schoberer & Ruud J. G. Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2018. "Adaptation of evidence‐based guideline recommendations to address urinary incontinence in nursing home residents according to the ADAPTE‐process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2974-2983, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:2974-2983
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14501
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helga E Breimaier & Ruud JG Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2011. "Nurses’ wishes, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers on implementing research findings into practice among graduate nurses in Austria," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1744-1756, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2016. "An evaluation of orthopaedic nurses' participation in an educational intervention promoting research usage – a triangulation convergence model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 846-855, March.
    2. Filipa Pereira & Victoria Pellaux & Henk Verloo, 2018. "Beliefs and implementation of evidence‐based practice among community health nurses: A cross‐sectional descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2052-2061, May.
    3. Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2018. "Caught between a rock and a hard place: An intrinsic single case study of nurse researchers’ experiences of the presence of a nursing research culture in clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1572-1580, April.
    4. Carol Hilliard & Maria Brenner, 2016. "Assimilation into daily practice: implementing and sustaining a randomised‐controlled trial in a children's clinical service," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 186-193, January.
    5. Oyeyemi Olajumoke Oyelade & Agathe Uwintonze & Munirat Olayinka Adebiyi, 2019. "Professionalism and Evidence-Based Mental Health Care: The Roadblocks and New Ways," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, October.
    6. Thi Ngoc Minh Nguyen & Anne Wilson, 2016. "Hospital readiness for undertaking evidence‐based practice: A survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 465-472, December.
    7. Yanfen Fu & Chunqing Wang & Yan Hu & Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, 2020. "The barriers to evidence‐based nursing implementation in mainland China: A qualitative content analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1038-1046, December.
    8. Ven Veeramah, 2016. "The use of evidenced‐based information by nurses and midwives to inform practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 340-350, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:2974-2983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.