IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p846-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of orthopaedic nurses' participation in an educational intervention promoting research usage – a triangulation convergence model

Author

Listed:
  • Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen
  • Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the orthopaedic nurses' experiences regarding the relevance of an educational intervention and their personal and contextual barriers to participation in the intervention. Background One of the largest barriers against nurses' research usage in clinical practice is the lack of participation. A previous survey identified 32 orthopaedic nurses as interested in participating in nursing research. An educational intervention was conducted to increase the orthopaedic nurses' research knowledge and competencies. However, only an average of six nurses participated. Design A triangulation convergence model was applied through a mixed methods design to combine quantitative results and qualitative findings for evaluation. Methods Data were collected from 2013–2014 from 32 orthopaedic nurses in a Danish regional hospital through a newly developed 21‐item questionnaire and two focus group sessions. Data were first analysed using descriptive statistics (stata 12.0) and qualitative manifest content analysis. Second, the results were compared, contrasted and interpreted using international literature. Results The nurses experienced the intervention as a new way to focus on nursing research in practice. However, some nurses were not able to see the relevance of research usage in clinical practice. Nursing research was not a top priority for the nurses and their personal barriers for research usage during their working day were prioritising patients’ and colleagues’ well‐being. Their colleagues’ and head section nurses' lack of acceptance regarding participation in the teaching session was a contextual barrier for the nurses. Conclusion The nurses were interested in participating in the intervention. However, some felt restricted by the research‐practice gap and by diverse personal and contextual barriers. Relevance to clinical practice The knowledge derived from this study has high clinical and practical relevance and is currently used to facilitate the nurses' research usage in the orthopaedic department setting, by working around the perceived barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2016. "An evaluation of orthopaedic nurses' participation in an educational intervention promoting research usage – a triangulation convergence model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 846-855, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:846-855
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Corchon & Mari Carmen Portillo & Roger Watson & Maribel Saracíbar, 2011. "Nursing research capacity building in a Spanish hospital: an intervention study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2479-2489, September.
    2. Helga E Breimaier & Ruud JG Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2011. "Nurses’ wishes, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers on implementing research findings into practice among graduate nurses in Austria," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1744-1756, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2018. "Caught between a rock and a hard place: An intrinsic single case study of nurse researchers’ experiences of the presence of a nursing research culture in clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1572-1580, April.
    2. Lesley Wilkes & Joanne Cummings & Nicola McKay, 2013. "Developing a Culture to Facilitate Research Capacity Building for Clinical Nurse Consultants in Generalist Paediatric Practice," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-8, July.
    3. Manuela Hoedl & Daniela Schoberer & Ruud J. G. Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2018. "Adaptation of evidence‐based guideline recommendations to address urinary incontinence in nursing home residents according to the ADAPTE‐process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2974-2983, August.
    4. Silvia Gros Navés & Olga Canet-Vélez & Williams Contreras-Higuera & Judith Garcia-Expósito & Jordi Torralbas-Ortega & Judith Roca, 2022. "Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Filipa Pereira & Victoria Pellaux & Henk Verloo, 2018. "Beliefs and implementation of evidence‐based practice among community health nurses: A cross‐sectional descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2052-2061, May.
    6. Carol Hilliard & Maria Brenner, 2016. "Assimilation into daily practice: implementing and sustaining a randomised‐controlled trial in a children's clinical service," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 186-193, January.
    7. Oyeyemi Olajumoke Oyelade & Agathe Uwintonze & Munirat Olayinka Adebiyi, 2019. "Professionalism and Evidence-Based Mental Health Care: The Roadblocks and New Ways," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, October.
    8. Thi Ngoc Minh Nguyen & Anne Wilson, 2016. "Hospital readiness for undertaking evidence‐based practice: A survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 465-472, December.
    9. Yanfen Fu & Chunqing Wang & Yan Hu & Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, 2020. "The barriers to evidence‐based nursing implementation in mainland China: A qualitative content analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1038-1046, December.
    10. Ven Veeramah, 2016. "The use of evidenced‐based information by nurses and midwives to inform practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 340-350, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:846-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.