Author
Listed:
- Taina Sormunen
- Arthur Aanesen
- Bjöörn Fossum
- Klas Karlgren
- Margareta Westerbotn
Abstract
Aim and objectives To explore infertility‐related communication and coping strategies among women affected by primary or secondary fertility problems. Background Infertility is a worldwide problem and is experienced as psychologically stressful. Communication about infertility varies depending on clinical aspects, personal relationships and culture. Methods A quantitative cross‐sectional study design was used. One hundred and ninety‐nine women affected by primary and secondary infertility were recruited from one fertility clinic in Stockholm. A structured self‐administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The answers were compared across the two groups using the chi‐squared test for independence. Results The majority of the women discussed infertility‐related subjects with intimate friends and/or relatives and did not discuss the results of examinations and tests with people outside of the family. There were significant differences between the two groups. Twice as many women with secondary infertility acknowledged that they never talk about the causes or results of the tests and examinations with other people, compared with women with primary infertility. Approximately 25% of the women with primary infertility used distraction techniques, such as turning to work, as a coping strategy compared to women with secondary infertility (10%). Some women did not discuss the inability to conceive and reasons why they were childless with their spouses. Twelve percentage of the women reported that they left the room when the subjects of children were being discussed. Approximately 30% of the participants did not ask friends or relatives for advice and a few were not able to discuss how tests and treatments affected them emotionally. Conclusion This study indicates that a majority of infertile women discuss about infertility‐related subjects with their spouses. However, they are less likely to discuss the reason for infertility and results of tests and examinations with people outside the family. Relevance to the clinical practice The result of the current study can be useful regarding interventions for women affected by primary or by secondary infertility. The healthcare staff must be alert and attentive to pay attention to these possible challenges. Identification of women at risk of developing emotional problems due to communication difficulties regarding infertility‐related issues merits close attention.
Suggested Citation
Taina Sormunen & Arthur Aanesen & Bjöörn Fossum & Klas Karlgren & Margareta Westerbotn, 2018.
"Infertility‐related communication and coping strategies among women affected by primary or secondary infertility,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 335-344, January.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e335-e344
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13953
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Greil, Arthur L. & McQuillan, Julia & Lowry, Michele & Shreffler, Karina M., 2011.
"Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 87-94, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Almeling, Rene & Willey, Iris L., 2017.
"Same medicine, different reasons: Comparing women's bodily experiences of producing eggs for pregnancy or for profit,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 21-29.
- Jansen, Natalie Anne & Saint Onge, Jarron M., 2015.
"An internet forum analysis of stigma power perceptions among women seeking fertility treatment in the United States,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 184-189.
- Karina Shreffler & Stacy Tiemeyer & Cassandra Dorius & Tiffany Spierling & Arthur Greil & Julia McQuillan, 2016.
"Infertility and fertility intentions, desires, and outcomes among US women,"
Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(39), pages 1149-1168.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e335-e344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.