IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v188y2017icp21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Same medicine, different reasons: Comparing women's bodily experiences of producing eggs for pregnancy or for profit

Author

Listed:
  • Almeling, Rene
  • Willey, Iris L.

Abstract

Women doing in vitro fertilization (IVF) to have a child describe it as painful and emotionally draining. Egg donors undergo the same medical regimen for a different reason – to produce eggs for another woman in exchange for thousands of dollars – and describe it as quick and relatively painless. Medical researchers typically compare bodily responses by variables such as gender, age, and health status. We use the case of “egg production” to propose a new factor that may be an important source of variation in bodily experience: an individual's reason for undergoing the medical intervention in the first place. Using cluster analysis to analyze an original survey of 50 IVF patients and 62 egg donors from the United States, we find two distinct kinds of bodily experiences – “less intense” and “more intense” – and the intensity of one's experience is associated with one's reason for producing eggs: either to become pregnant or to donate them for money.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeling, Rene & Willey, Iris L., 2017. "Same medicine, different reasons: Comparing women's bodily experiences of producing eggs for pregnancy or for profit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 21-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:188:y:2017:i:c:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617303969
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filiz Garip, 2012. "Discovering Diverse Mechanisms of Migration: The Mexico–US Stream 1970–2000," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 38(3), pages 393-433, September.
    2. Anna Makles, 2012. "Stata tip 110: How to get the optimal k-means cluster solution," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 12(2), pages 347-351, June.
    3. Greil, Arthur L. & McQuillan, Julia & Lowry, Michele & Shreffler, Karina M., 2011. "Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 87-94, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mukherjee, Meghna, 2020. "The Management of Unequal Patient Status in Fertility Medicine: Donors' and Intended Parents’ Experiences of Participatory and Imposed Enrollment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Mittenzwei & Wolfgang Britz, 2018. "Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 777-793, September.
    2. Karina Shreffler & Stacy Tiemeyer & Cassandra Dorius & Tiffany Spierling & Arthur Greil & Julia McQuillan, 2016. "Infertility and fertility intentions, desires, and outcomes among US women," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(39), pages 1149-1168.
    3. Gianluca Trotta & Kirsten Gram-Hanssen & Pernille Lykke Jørgensen, 2020. "Heterogeneity of Electricity Consumption Patterns in Vulnerable Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Asya Pisarevskaya & Peter Scholten & Zeynep Kaşlı, 2022. "Classifying the Diversity of Urban Diversities: an Inductive Analysis of European Cities," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 655-677, June.
    5. Sebastiano Cattaruzzo & Giancarlo Corò & Roshan Borsato, 2024. "Technological complexity and international reach in SMEs: an empirical investigation in an industrial region," Working Papers 2024: 16, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Mulabdic, Alen & Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2022. "Trade barriers in government procurement," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Eunice Williams & Heini Vaisanen & Sabu S. Padmadas, 2022. "Women's economic empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from cross-national population data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(15), pages 415-452.
    8. Yu, Bingxin & Guo, Zhe, 2015. "Measurement of agricultural productivity in Africa south of Sahara: A spatial typology application:," IFPRI discussion papers 1410, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Burlando, Alfredo & Kuhn, Michael A. & Prina, Silvia, 2023. "Too Fast, Too Furious? Digital Credit Delivery Speed and Repayment Rates," IZA Discussion Papers 16451, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Hou, Yuting & Yap, Winston & Chua, Rochelle & Song, Siqi & Yuen, Belinda, 2020. "The associations between older adults’ daily travel pattern and objective and perceived built environment: A study of three neighbourhoods in Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 314-328.
    11. Jacopo Gabani & Sumit Mazumdar & Marc Suhrcke, 2023. "The effect of health financing systems on health system outcomes: A cross‐country panel analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 574-619, March.
    12. Zhu, Jialiang & Liu, Yun & Fang, Ying, 2023. "A blessing in disguise—The effect of China’s Covid-19 health code system on older people’s mobile payment usage," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    13. Taina Sormunen & Arthur Aanesen & Bjöörn Fossum & Klas Karlgren & Margareta Westerbotn, 2018. "Infertility‐related communication and coping strategies among women affected by primary or secondary infertility," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 335-344, January.
    14. Ahn, Soojung & Lee, Sang Hyeon, 2016. "Impact of Aid for Trade to Agricultural Development and Trade," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230119, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Xinyi Wang & Na Hou & Bo Chen, 2023. "Democracy, military expenditure and economic growth: A heterogeneous perspective," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 1039-1070, November.
    16. Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz & Diego B. Borjas-Cavero & Jimmy D. Páucar-Alfaro & Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco, 2022. "Multimorbidity Patterns among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from Lima, Peru," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Robinson, Sarah & Bozayeva, Zhanyl & Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon & Djanibekov, Nodir & Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Ranchers or pastoralists? Farm size, specialisation and production strategy amongst cattle farmers in south-eastern Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    18. Heiner Lüpke & Lucas Leopold & Jale Tosun, 2023. "Institutional coordination arrangements as elements of policy design spaces: insights from climate policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 49-68, March.
    19. Majid Hashemi, 2021. "The Effect of Reliability Improvements on Household Electricity Consumption and Coping Behavior: A Multi-dimensional Approach," Working Paper 1469, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    20. Erin Trouth Hofmann & E. Miranda Reiter, 2018. "Geographic Variation in Sex Ratios of the US Immigrant Population: Identifying Sources of Difference," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(3), pages 485-509, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:188:y:2017:i:c:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.