IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe242-e250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of gender, BMI and body shape on theoretical injection outcome at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa A Larkin
  • Elfriede Ashcroft
  • Blake A Hickey
  • Asmahan Elgellaie

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to determine the influences of gender, BMI and observed body shape on subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses, and theoretical injection outcome, at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal intramuscular injection sites. Background Debate continues as to whether the dorsogluteal or ventrogluteal injection site is more reliable for a successful intramuscular injection outcome. Subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses at the injection site are direct determinants of intramuscular injection outcome. BMI and observed body shape influence gluteal subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses, and therefore injection outcome, with potentially distinct effects at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites. Design This was a cross‐sectional study. Methods Demographic data were collected, and subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses were quantified bilaterally at the dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites using ultrasound, for 145 participants (57% female). Results Subcutaneous fat and muscle were significantly thicker at the dorsogluteal than the ventrogluteal site, and 75% and 86% of participants would receive a successful intramuscular injection at these sites, respectively. There were significant effects of gender, BMI and observed body shape on subcutaneous fat thickness and theoretical injection outcome at both sites. Females, obese individuals and endomorph individuals had thicker subcutaneous fat and were more likely to have a subcutaneous injection outcome. Conclusions Gender, BMI and observed body shape could be used to guide site and needle length selection when administering gluteal intramuscular injections to increase the likelihood of a successful intramuscular injection outcome. Relevance to clinical practice Both gluteal injection sites should be avoided in obese individuals and endomorph individuals. An intramuscular injection will be successful: using a 32‐mm needle at the ventrogluteal site for all males and normal‐weight females and using a 38‐mm needle for all females at the ventrogluteal site, and for all males and at least 98% of females at the dorsogluteal site.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa A Larkin & Elfriede Ashcroft & Blake A Hickey & Asmahan Elgellaie, 2018. "Influence of gender, BMI and body shape on theoretical injection outcome at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 242-250, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e242-e250
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13923
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen Greenway, 2014. "Rituals in nursing: intramuscular injections," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3583-3588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leyla Baran & Ülkü Güneş & Hilal Dönmez, 2023. "Investigation of the Necessity of Aspiration During the Intramuscular Injection Administered in the Ventrogluteal Site and Its Effect on Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(4), pages 821-829, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e242-e250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.