IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3583-3588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rituals in nursing: intramuscular injections

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Greenway

Abstract

Aims and objectives To consider to what extent intramuscular injection technique can be described to remain entrenched in ritualistic practice and how evidence‐based practice should be considered and applied to the nursing practice of this essential skill. Background The notion of rituals within nursing and the value or futile impact they afford to this essential nursing skill will be critically reviewed. Design Discursive paper. Method Literature review from 2002–2013 to review the current position of intramuscular injection injections. Results Within the literature review, it became clear that there are several actions within the administration of an intramuscular injection that could be perceived as ritualistic and require consideration for contemporary nursing practice. Conclusions The essential nursing skill of intramuscular injection often appears to fit into the description of a ritualised practice. By providing evidence‐based care, nurses will find themselves empowered to make informed decisions based on clinical need and using their clinical judgement. Relevance to clinical practice For key learning, it will outline with rationale how site selection, needle selection, insertion technique and aspiration can be cited as examples of routinised or ritualistic practice and why these should be rejected in favour of an evidence‐based approach. The effect on some student nurses of experiencing differing practices between what is taught at university and what is often seen in clinical practice will also be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Greenway, 2014. "Rituals in nursing: intramuscular injections," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3583-3588, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3583-3588
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12627
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theresa A Larkin & Elfriede Ashcroft & Blake A Hickey & Asmahan Elgellaie, 2018. "Influence of gender, BMI and body shape on theoretical injection outcome at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 242-250, January.
    2. Leyla Baran & Ülkü Güneş & Hilal Dönmez, 2023. "Investigation of the Necessity of Aspiration During the Intramuscular Injection Administered in the Ventrogluteal Site and Its Effect on Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(4), pages 821-829, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3583-3588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.