IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe223-e234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Pain relieved, but still struggling”—Critically ill patients experiences of pain and other discomforts during analgosedation

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Berntzen
  • Ida Torunn Bjørk
  • Hilde Wøien

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how critically ill patients treated according to a strategy of analgosedation experience and handle pain, other discomforts and wakefulness. Background Patients experience both pain and discomfort while in the intensive care unit. International guidelines recommend focused pain treatment and light sedation. An analgosedation protocol favouring pain management, light sedation and early mobilisation was implemented in our university hospital medical and surgical intensive care unit in Norway in 2014. The analgosedation approach may affect patients’ experiences of the intensive care unit stay. Design Exploratory, descriptive design using semi‐structured interviews. Method Eighteen adult patients treated in intensive care unit >24 hr and receiving mechanical ventilation were interviewed 1–9 days after intensive care unit discharge. Ten patients were re‐interviewed after 3 months. Data were analysed using the “systematic text condensation” approach. Findings Four main categories emerged from the analysis: “In discomfort, but rarely in pain,” “Struggling to get a grip on reality,” “Holding on” and “Handling emotionally trapped experiences.” “Pain relieved, but still struggling” was the overarching theme. Analgosedation provided good pain relief, but patients still described frequent physical and psychological discomforts, in particular related to mechanical ventilation, not understanding what was going on, and experiences of delusions. To come to terms with their intensive care unit stay, patients needed to participate, trust in others and endure suffering. After hospital discharge, patients described both repression of experiences and searching for recognition of what they had gone through. Relevance to clinical practice Despite good pain relief during analgosedation, other discomforts were commonly described. Critically ill patients still experience an intensive care unit stay as a traumatic part of their illness trajectory. Nurses need to attend carefully also to discomforts other than pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Hilde Wøien, 2018. "“Pain relieved, but still struggling”—Critically ill patients experiences of pain and other discomforts during analgosedation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 223-234, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e223-e234
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13920
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helle Svenningsen & Ingrid Egerod & Pia Dreyer, 2016. "Strange and scary memories of the intensive care unit: a qualitative, longitudinal study inspired by Ricoeur's interpretation theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2807-2815, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    2. Matteo Danielis & Arianna Povoli & Elisa Mattiussi & Alvisa Palese, 2020. "Understanding patients’ experiences of being mechanically ventilated in the Intensive Care Unit: Findings from a meta‐synthesis and meta‐summary," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2107-2124, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanne Kristiansen & Hanne Konradsen & Malene Beck, 2019. "Nurses’ experiences of caring for older patients afflicted by delirium in a neurological department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 920-930, March.
    2. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    3. Charlotte Handberg & Anna Katarina Voss, 2018. "Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 102-114, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e223-e234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.