IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p102-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Handberg
  • Anna Katarina Voss

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the perspectives of healthcare professionals caring for intubated patients on implementing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in critical care settings. Background Patients in critical care settings subjected to endotracheal intubation suffer from a temporary functional speech disorder and can also experience anxiety, stress and delirium, leading to longer and more complicated hospitalisation and rehabilitation. Little is known about the use of AAC in critical care settings. Method The design was informed by interpretive descriptive methodology along with the theoretical framework symbolic interactionism, which guided the study of healthcare professionals (n = 48) in five different intensive care units. Data were generated through participant observations and 10 focus group interviews. Results The findings represent an understanding of the healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementing AAC in critical care settings and revealed three themes. Caring Ontology was the foundation of the healthcare professionals' profession. Cultural Belief represented the actual premise in the interactions during the healthcare professionals' work, saving lives in a biomedical setting whilst appearing competent and efficient, leading to Triggered Conduct and giving low priority to psychosocial issues like communication. Conclusion Lack of the ability to communicate puts patients at greater risk of receiving poorer treatment, which supports the pressuring need to implement and use AAC in critical care. It is documented that culture in biomedical paradigms can have consequences that are the opposite of the staffs' ideals. The findings may guide staff in implementing AAC strategies in their communication with patients and at the same time preserve their caring ontology and professional pride. Relevance to clinical practice Improving communication strategies may improve patient safety and make a difference in patient outcomes. Increased knowledge of and familiarity with AAC strategies may provide healthcare professionals with an enhanced feeling of competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Handberg & Anna Katarina Voss, 2018. "Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 102-114, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:102-114
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helle Svenningsen & Ingrid Egerod & Pia Dreyer, 2016. "Strange and scary memories of the intensive care unit: a qualitative, longitudinal study inspired by Ricoeur's interpretation theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2807-2815, October.
    2. Anne Sophie Ågård & Kirsten Lomborg, 2011. "Flexible family visitation in the intensive care unit: nurses’ decision‐making," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1106-1114, April.
    3. Yeter Sinem Üzar Özçetin & Duygu Hiçdurmaz, 2015. "Approaches of intensive care nurses towards sensory requirements of patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3186-3196, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    2. Pauline Wong & Pranee Liamputtong & Susan Koch & Helen Rawson, 2019. "Searching for meaning: A grounded theory of family resilience in adult ICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 781-791, March.
    3. Susanne Kristiansen & Hanne Konradsen & Malene Beck, 2019. "Nurses’ experiences of caring for older patients afflicted by delirium in a neurological department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 920-930, March.
    4. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Hilde Wøien, 2018. "“Pain relieved, but still struggling”—Critically ill patients experiences of pain and other discomforts during analgosedation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 223-234, January.
    5. Pamela Page & Alan Simpson & Lisa Reynolds, 2019. "Bearing witness and being bounded: The experiences of nurses in adult critical care in relation to the survivorship needs of patients and families," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3210-3221, September.
    6. Pauline Wong & Pranee Liamputtong & Susan Koch & Helen Rawson, 2017. "Barriers to regaining control within a constructivist grounded theory of family resilience in ICU: Living with uncertainty," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4390-4403, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:102-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.