IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p345-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing assessment as an effective tool for the identification of delirium risk in older in‐patients: A case–control study

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Solà‐Miravete
  • Carlos López
  • Estrella Martínez‐Segura
  • Mireia Adell‐Lleixà
  • Maria Eulàlia Juvé‐Udina
  • Mar Lleixà‐Fortuño

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive nursing assessment as a strategy for determining the risk of delirium in older in‐patients from a model of care needs based on variables easily measured by nurses. Background There are many scales of assessment and prediction of risk of delirium, but they are little known and infrequently used by professionals. Recognition of delirium by doctors and nurses continues to be limited. Design and methods A case–control study. A specific form of data collection was designed to include the risk factors for delirium commonly identified in the literature and the care needs evaluated from the comprehensive nursing assessment based on the Virginia Henderson model of care needs. We studied 454 in‐patient units in a basic general hospital. Data were collected from a review of the records of patients’ electronic clinical history. Results The areas of care that were significant in patients with delirium were dyspnoea, problems with nutrition, elimination, mobility, rest and sleep, self‐care, physical safety, communication and relationships. The specific risk factors identified as independent predictors were as follows: age, urinary incontinence, urinary catheter, alcohol abuse, previous history of dementia, being able to get out of bed/not being at rest, habitual insomnia and history of social risk. Conclusions Comprehensive nursing assessment is a valid and consistent strategy with a multifactorial model of delirium, which enables the personalised risk assessment necessary to define a plan of care with specific interventions for each patient to be made. Relevance to clinical practice The identification of the risk of delirium is particularly important in the context of prevention. In a model of care based on needs, nursing assessment is a useful component in the risk assessment of delirium and one that is necessary for developing an individualised care regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Solà‐Miravete & Carlos López & Estrella Martínez‐Segura & Mireia Adell‐Lleixà & Maria Eulàlia Juvé‐Udina & Mar Lleixà‐Fortuño, 2018. "Nursing assessment as an effective tool for the identification of delirium risk in older in‐patients: A case–control study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 345-354, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:345-354
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13921
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed El Hussein & Sandra Hirst & Vincent Salyers, 2015. "Factors that contribute to underrecognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings: a scoping review of the literature to explain this phenomenon," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 906-915, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:345-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.