IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i7-8p906-915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that contribute to underrecognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings: a scoping review of the literature to explain this phenomenon

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed El Hussein
  • Sandra Hirst
  • Vincent Salyers

Abstract

Aims and objectives In order to obtain more information regarding this phenomenon, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken to analyse current research on the recognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings. Background Delirium is often manifested as a sign of an underlying undiagnosed condition that requires immediate intervention and is frequently manifested in acute care settings. Unfortunately, registered nurses often do not recognise delirium and its occurrence goes under‐reported. Design/Methods Based on six inclusion criteria, a search in numerous databases using terms such as delirium detection, recognition and diagnosis by registered nurses was undertaken. Eight quantitative studies were deemed relevant and analysed for this scoping review. Results Seven major categories emerged: the fluctuating nature of delirium, the impact of delirium education on its recognition, communication barriers, inadequate use of delirium assessment tools, lack of conceptual understanding of delirium, delirium as a burden and the likeness of delirium and dementia. A brief summary of the findings in each category is reported here. Conclusions The scoping review revealed that delirium remains underrecognised by registered nurses, which potentially contributes to reduced quality of nursing care for clients experiencing this condition. Further research on delirium and the processes that registered nurses use to recognise it is timely and will facilitate the development of evidence‐based interventions to manage it. Relevance to clinical practice While acute care registered nurses have historically reported dramatic changes in cognitive and neuro‐biological functions in ill older adults, the literature highlighted in this scoping review revealed the following: (1) the need for further research to validate delirium assessment tools and, (2) the need for education and training for registered nurses on the use of these assessment tools to promote early recognition and thereby decrease the incidence of delirium in older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed El Hussein & Sandra Hirst & Vincent Salyers, 2015. "Factors that contribute to underrecognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings: a scoping review of the literature to explain this phenomenon," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 906-915, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:906-915
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siobhan Mc Donnell & Fiona Timmins, 2012. "A quantitative exploration of the subjective burden experienced by nurses when caring for patients with delirium," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2488-2498, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Solà‐Miravete & Carlos López & Estrella Martínez‐Segura & Mireia Adell‐Lleixà & Maria Eulàlia Juvé‐Udina & Mar Lleixà‐Fortuño, 2018. "Nursing assessment as an effective tool for the identification of delirium risk in older in‐patients: A case–control study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 345-354, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vimala Ramoo & Harlinna Abu & Vineya Rai & Surindar Kaur Surat Singh & Ayuni Asma’ Baharudin & Mahmoud Danaee & Raveena Rajalachimi R Thinagaran, 2018. "Educational intervention on delirium assessment using confusion assessment method‐ICU (CAM‐ICU) in a general intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4028-4039, November.
    2. Angela Teece & John Baker & Helen Smith, 2020. "Identifying determinants for the application of physical or chemical restraint in the management of psychomotor agitation on the critical care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 5-19, January.
    3. Angela Malik & Todd Harlan & Janice Cobb, 2016. "Stop. Think. Delirium! A quality improvement initiative to explore utilising a validated cognitive assessment tool in the acute inpatient medical setting to detect delirium and prompt early interventi," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3400-3408, November.
    4. Rhonda L Babine & Kristiina E Hyrkäs & Sarah Hallen & Heidi R Wierman & Deborah A Bachand & Joanne L Chapman & Valerie J Fuller, 2018. "Falls and delirium in an acute care setting: A retrospective chart review before and after an organisation‐wide interprofessional education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1429-1441, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:906-915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.