IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p5121-5132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolving professional identity of the clinical research nurse: A qualitative exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Swapna Kunhunny
  • Debra Salmon

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the perspectives of CRNs in the UK on their professional role identity, in order to inform the professional practice of Clinical Research Nursing. Background Clinical research nurses (CRN) make a significant contribution to healthcare research within the UK and internationally. However, lack of clarity about their role, and scope of practice renders their contribution within the profession and in the minds of the wider public invisible. This has implications in terms of promoting the role nurses play not only in terms of recruitment, retention, and care of research participants but also as research leaders of the future. Design Exploratory qualitative design using thematic analysis conducted within a realist paradigm. Results Participants viewed the positive aspects of their identity ‘as agents of change’ who were fundamental to the clinical research process. Resourcefulness and the ability to guide members of the research team were valued as key to job satisfaction. Successful navigation through the complexity of advice, support, management and leadership tasks related to their role in caring for research patients were role affirming and generated a sense of pride. However, lack of recognition, clarity of the role and career development opportunities within an identified structure undermined the CRN identity and optimism about progression in the future. Participants reported feeling invisible to colleagues within the clinical community, isolated and excluded from wider nursing groups. Conclusions The study describes UK CRN practice, highlighting the positive benefits and challenges associated with the role, including the need to support professional and career development to maximise their research contribution. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides nurses, health care and research organisations and academic nursing educators with a broadened understanding of the professional role, identity and context of clinical research nursing practice in the United Kingdom, with recommendations to improve its professional efficiency and recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Swapna Kunhunny & Debra Salmon, 2017. "The evolving professional identity of the clinical research nurse: A qualitative exploration," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5121-5132, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5121-5132
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatrice Backman Lönn & Niclas Olofsson & Mats Jong, 2019. "Translation and validation of the Clinical Trial Nursing Questionnaire in Swedish—A first step to clarify the clinical research nurse role in Sweden," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2696-2705, July.
    2. Orlaith Hernon & Rachael Dalton & Maura Dowling, 2020. "Clinical research nurses’ expectations and realities of their role: A qualitative evidence synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 667-683, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5121-5132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.