IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4745-4755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of health and self‐care among older persons—To be implemented in an interactive information and communication technology‐platform

Author

Listed:
  • Carina Göransson
  • Yvonne Wengström
  • Kristina Ziegert
  • Ann Langius‐Eklöf
  • Irene Eriksson
  • Annica Kihlgren
  • Karin Blomberg

Abstract

Aim and objectives To acquire knowledge regarding the contents to be implemented in an interactive information and communication technology‐platform perceived to be relevant to health and self‐care among older persons based on the literature, healthcare professionals and the older persons themselves. Background The growing ageing population places demands on the healthcare system to promote healthy ageing and to strengthen the older person's self‐care ability. This requires innovative approaches to facilitate communication between the older person and healthcare professionals, and to increase the older person's participation in their care. An information and communication technology‐platform could be used for this purpose, but the content needs to be relevant to both the older persons and the healthcare professionals. Design Descriptive qualitative design. Methods This study was based on three samplings: a scoping review of the literature (n = 20 articles), interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 5) and a secondary analysis of interviews with older persons (n = 8) and nursing assistants (n = 7). The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four areas were identified to be of relevance to older persons’ perceived health: frame of mind, having relationships and social activities, physical ability and concerns, and maintaining self‐care. Self‐care was described in the literature and by the healthcare professionals more than by the older persons. Conclusions The results show a concordance in the data samplings that give a clear indication of the areas relevant to older persons’ health and self‐care that can be integrated in an interactive information and communication technology‐platform for use in regular daily care assessments. Descriptions of self‐care were limited indicating a possible gap in knowledge that requires further research. Relevance to clinical practice Areas relevant to older persons’ health and self‐care could be used for regular assessment to support and promote healthy ageing.

Suggested Citation

  • Carina Göransson & Yvonne Wengström & Kristina Ziegert & Ann Langius‐Eklöf & Irene Eriksson & Annica Kihlgren & Karin Blomberg, 2017. "Perspectives of health and self‐care among older persons—To be implemented in an interactive information and communication technology‐platform," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4745-4755, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4745-4755
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13827
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 374-377, June.
    2. Tara L. Gruenewald & Diana H. Liao & Teresa E. Seeman, 2012. "Contributing to Others, Contributing to Oneself: Perceptions of Generativity and Health in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(6), pages 660-665.
    3. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 138-140, February.
    4. Bryant, Lucinda L. & Corbett, Kitty K. & Kutner, Jean S., 2001. "In their own words: a model of healthy aging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 927-941, October.
    5. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Tara L. Gruenewald & Arun S. Karlamangla & Gail A. Greendale & Burton H. Singer & Teresa E. Seeman, 2007. "Feelings of Usefulness to Others, Disability, and Mortality in Older Adults: The MacArthur Study of Successful Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(1), pages 28-37.
    7. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 540-542, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amaresh Panda & Sanjay Mohapatra, 2021. "Online Healthcare Practices and Associated Stakeholders: Review of Literature for Future Research Agenda," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(2), pages 71-85, June.
    2. Barrington, D.J. & Sridharan, S. & Shields, K.F. & Saunders, S.G. & Souter, R.T. & Bartram, J., 2017. "Sanitation marketing: A systematic review and theoretical critique using the capability approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 128-134.
    3. Sclar, G.D. & Penakalapati, G. & Caruso, B.A. & Rehfuess, E.A. & Garn, J.V. & Alexander, K.T. & Freeman, M.C. & Boisson, S. & Medlicott, K. & Clasen, T., 2018. "Exploring the relationship between sanitation and mental and social well-being: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 121-134.
    4. Odelia Koh & Jeannette Lee & Maudrene L S Tan & E-Shyong Tai & Ce Jin Foo & Kok Joon Chong & Su-Yen Goh & Yong Mong Bee & Julian Thumboo & Yin-Bun Cheung & Avjeet Singh & Hwee-Lin Wee, 2014. "Establishing the Thematic Framework for a Diabetes-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Item Bank for Use in an English-Speaking Asian Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Viola, Lora Anne, 2008. "WHO says competition is healthy: How civil society can change IGOs [Die WHO sagt: Wettbewerb ist gesund. Wie Zivilgesellschaft IGOs verändern kann]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    7. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Völker, Sebastian & Kistemann, Thomas, 2013. "Reprint of: “I'm always entirely happy when I'm here!” Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 141-152.
    9. Jozef Bavoľár & Oľga Orosová, 2015. "Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(1), pages 115-122, January.
    10. Roberto Adriani, 2019. "The Evolution of Fake News and the Abuse of Emerging Technologies," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejss_v2_i.
    11. Tim Lomas & Kate Hefferon & Itai Ivtzan, 2015. "The LIFE Model: A Meta-Theoretical Conceptual Map for Applied Positive Psychology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1347-1364, October.
    12. Jeanne Landgraf, 2001. "Measuring and monitoring quality of life in children and youth: A brief commentary," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 46(5), pages 281-282, September.
    13. Rock, Melanie J. & Degeling, Chris, 2015. "Public health ethics and more-than-human solidarity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 61-67.
    14. Çevik, Tuğçe, 2020. "Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on General Health Status," MPRA Paper 101346, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gulshan Kumar & Jagmohan Singh, 2020. "Health Infrastructure Disparities in Punjab: An Inter-district Analysis," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(1), pages 25-38, June.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:115-122 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Gibson, Barbara E. & Secker, Barbara & Rolfe, Debbie & Wagner, Frank & Parke, Bob & Mistry, Bhavnita, 2012. "Disability and dignity-enabling home environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 211-219.
    18. Corey L. M. Keyes & Malik Muhammad Sohail & Nneka Jebose Molokwu & Heather Parnell & Cyrilla Amanya & Venkata Gopala Krishna Kaza & Yohannes Benyam Saddo & Vanroth Vann & Senti Tzudier & Rae Jean Proe, 2021. "How Would You Describe a Mentally Healthy Person? A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Orphans and Separated Children," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1719-1743, April.
    19. Willard G. Manning, Jr. & Joseph P. Newhouse & John E. Ware, Jr., 1982. "The Status of Health in Demand Estimation; or, Beyond Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Aspects of Health, pages 141-184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Bruns, Diedrich & Münderlein, Daniel, 2018. ""Paysage à votre santé". Gesundheitsfördernde Landschaften - Eine Betrachtung von Naturparken," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Weber, Florian & Weber, Friedericke & Jenal, Corinna (ed.), Wohin des Weges? Regionalentwicklung in Grossschutzgebieten, volume 21, pages 250-281, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    21. Stephen Birkett & David Rapport, 1998. "A framework for identifying and classifyingecosystem dysfunctions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 15-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4745-4755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.