IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4255-4266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining and comparing learning actions in two simulation modalities: students training on a latex arm and each other's arms

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Ravik
  • Anton Havnes
  • Ida Torunn Bjørk

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore, describe and compare learning actions that nursing students used during peripheral vein cannulation training on a latex arm or each other's arms in a clinical skills centre. Background Simulation‐based training is thought to enhance learning and transfer of learning from simulation to the clinical setting and is commonly recommended in nursing education. What students actually are doing during simulation‐based training is, however, less explored. The analysis of learning actions used during simulation‐based training could contribute to development and improvement of simulation as a learning strategy in nursing education. Design A qualitative explorative and descriptive research design, involving content analysis of video recordings, was used. Methods Video‐supported observation of nine nursing students practicing vein cannulation was conducted in a clinical skills centre in late 2012. Results The students engaged in various learning actions. Students training on a latex arm used a considerably higher number of learning actions relative to those training on each other's arms. In both groups, students’ learning actions consisted mainly of seeking and giving support. The teacher provided students training on each other's arms with detailed feedback regarding insertion of the cannula into the vein, while those training on a latex arm received sparse feedback from the teacher and fellow students. Conclusion The teacher played an important role in facilitating nursing students’ practical skill learning during simulation. The provision of support from both teachers and students should be emphasised to ensure that nursing students’ learning needs are met. Relevance to clinical practice This study suggest that student nurses may be differently and inadequately prepared in peripheral vein cannulation in two simulation modalities used in the academic setting; training on a latex arm and on each other's arms.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Ravik & Anton Havnes & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2017. "Defining and comparing learning actions in two simulation modalities: students training on a latex arm and each other's arms," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4255-4266, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4255-4266
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13748
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Ravik & Anton Havnes & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2017. "Conditions Affecting the Performance of Peripheral Vein Cannulation during Hospital Placement: A Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4255-4266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.