IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i11-12p1473-1484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A narrative review of acute care nurses’ experiences nursing patients with intellectual disability: underprepared, communication barriers and ambiguity about the role of caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Lewis
  • Ryan J Gaffney
  • Nathan J Wilson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe how nurses experience caring for people with intellectual disability in an acute care setting. Background Recent advances in the care of people with intellectual disability in hospital are primarily based upon the experiences of people with intellectual disability and their caregivers. Little is known about the experiences of registered nurses caring for people with intellectual disability, yet the experiences of nurses in delivering care largely determine the quality of care experienced by people with intellectual disability and their caregivers. Methods A narrative literature review using electronic database searches was conducted using variants of the terms disability, nursing and acute care. Results Through our reading of the recent literature describing the experiences of nurses caring for people with intellectual disability in an acute care setting, we have identified three themes: (1) nurses feel underprepared when caring for patients with intellectual disability, (2) nurses experience challenges when communicating with people with intellectual disability and (3) nurses have ambiguous expectations of paid and unpaid caregivers. Conclusion The enablers of and barriers to the delivery of nursing care in acute care settings need to be made explicit and researchers and nurses need to collaborate in the development, implementation and evaluation of care delivery strategies. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses need to be adequately prepared to care for people with intellectual disability. Preparation should include dealing with the complexities of communicating with people with intellectual disability and practical experience of doing so in clinical and educational environments that ensure the safety and dignity of nurses and people with intellectual disability. Nurses need supportive strategies for developing therapeutic relationships with a range of informal and formal caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Lewis & Ryan J Gaffney & Nathan J Wilson, 2017. "A narrative review of acute care nurses’ experiences nursing patients with intellectual disability: underprepared, communication barriers and ambiguity about the role of caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1473-1484, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1473-1484
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Bradbury‐Jones & Janice Rattray & Martyn Jones & Stephen MacGillivray, 2013. "Promoting the health, safety and welfare of adults with learning disabilities in acute care settings: a structured literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1497-1509, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Brown & Zoë Chouliara & Juliet MacArthur & Andrew McKechanie & Siobhan Mack & Matt Hayes & Joan Fletcher, 2016. "The perspectives of stakeholders of intellectual disability liaison nurses: a model of compassionate, person‐centred care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 972-982, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1473-1484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.