IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p972-982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perspectives of stakeholders of intellectual disability liaison nurses: a model of compassionate, person‐centred care

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Brown
  • Zoë Chouliara
  • Juliet MacArthur
  • Andrew McKechanie
  • Siobhan Mack
  • Matt Hayes
  • Joan Fletcher

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the experiences of patients with intellectual disabilities, family and paid carers regarding the role of liaison nurses and the delivery of compassionate, person‐centred care. From this to propose a model of person‐centred care embedded in these experiences. Background People with intellectual disabilities have a high number of comorbidities, requiring multidisciplinary care, and are at high risk of morbidity and preventable mortality. Provision of compassionate, person‐centred care is essential to prevent complications and avoid death. Design A qualitative design was adopted with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for data analysis. Methods Semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted. Data were analysed with a focus on compassionate, person‐centred care elements and components. Themes were modelled to develop a clinically meaningful model for practice. Results Themes identified vulnerability, presence and the human interface; information balance; critical points and broken trust; roles and responsibilities; managing multiple transitions; ‘flagging up’ and communication. Conclusions The findings provide the first ‘anatomy’ of compassionate, person‐centred care and provide a model for operationalising this approach in practice. The applicability of the model will have to be evaluated further with this and other vulnerable groups. Relevance to clinical practice This is the first study to provide a definition of compassionate, person‐centred care and proposes a model to support its application into clinical practice for this and other vulnerable groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Brown & Zoë Chouliara & Juliet MacArthur & Andrew McKechanie & Siobhan Mack & Matt Hayes & Joan Fletcher, 2016. "The perspectives of stakeholders of intellectual disability liaison nurses: a model of compassionate, person‐centred care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 972-982, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:972-982
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Bradbury‐Jones & Janice Rattray & Martyn Jones & Stephen MacGillivray, 2013. "Promoting the health, safety and welfare of adults with learning disabilities in acute care settings: a structured literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1497-1509, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Brown & Anna Higgins & Juliet MacArthur, 2020. "Transition from child to adult health services: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of families of young adults with intellectual disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 195-207, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Lewis & Ryan J Gaffney & Nathan J Wilson, 2017. "A narrative review of acute care nurses’ experiences nursing patients with intellectual disability: underprepared, communication barriers and ambiguity about the role of caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1473-1484, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:972-982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.