IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i9-10p1367-1376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early skin‐to‐skin contact for healthy full‐term infants after vaginal and caesarean delivery: a qualitative study on clinician perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Inez Koopman
  • Jennifer A. Callaghan‐Koru
  • Oluwatope Alaofin
  • Cynthia H. Argani
  • Azadeh Farzin

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aims to provide insight into key factors from a clinician's perspective that influence uninterrupted early skin‐to‐skin contact after vaginal and caesarean delivery of healthy full‐term infants. Background Early skin‐to‐skin contact of healthy full‐term infants ideally begins immediately after birth and continues for the first hour or the first breastfeed as recommended by the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. However, adoption of early skin‐to‐skin contact is low in many settings and the barriers that hinder its universal use are not well understood. Design An exploratory qualitative research design using semi‐structured interviews. Methods Eleven clinicians were interviewed, including five registered nurses and one medical doctor from the obstetrics and gynaecology unit as well as four registered nurses and one medical doctor from the neonatal intensive care unit. Core topics that were discussed included perceptions on early skin‐to‐skin contact and facilitating factors and barriers to early skin‐to‐skin contact after vaginal and caesarean delivery. Interview sessions were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. A coding framework was developed from which subthemes emerged. The overall themes were adopted from Lee et al.'s thematic framework to categorise factors into institutional, familial‐level and implementation factors. Findings Critical institutional factors included inadequate staffing and education of clinicians on early skin‐to‐skin contact. On a familial level, parental education and motivation were identified as important factors. Barriers to implementation included the absence of a clinical algorithm and unclear definitions for eligible mothers and infants. Conclusions Various facilitating factors and barriers to early skin‐to‐skin contact of healthy full‐term infants born via vaginal and caesarean delivery were identified. Relevance to clinical practice Addressing these factors can help to provide a better understanding of clinician perspectives on early skin‐to‐skin contact and help guide its implementation as standard of care for healthy full‐term infants.

Suggested Citation

  • Inez Koopman & Jennifer A. Callaghan‐Koru & Oluwatope Alaofin & Cynthia H. Argani & Azadeh Farzin, 2016. "Early skin‐to‐skin contact for healthy full‐term infants after vaginal and caesarean delivery: a qualitative study on clinician perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1367-1376, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1367-1376
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evalotte Mörelius & Gene Cranston Anderson, 2015. "Neonatal nurses’ beliefs about almost continuous parent–infant skin‐to‐skin contact in neonatal intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2620-2627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingqi Deng & Yao Zhang & Qiufang Li & Hua Wang & Xinfen Xu, 2018. "Factors that have an impact on knowledge, attitude and practice related to kangaroo care: National survey study among neonatal nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4100-4111, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1367-1376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.