IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i17-18p2620-2627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neonatal nurses’ beliefs about almost continuous parent–infant skin‐to‐skin contact in neonatal intensive care

Author

Listed:
  • Evalotte Mörelius
  • Gene Cranston Anderson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe what nurses believe about almost continuous skin‐to‐skin contact for preterm infants between 320–360 weeks gestation. Background Skin‐to‐skin contact a few hours per day has become standard care for preterm infants in most high‐technology neonatal intensive care units. However, few units practice Kangaroo Mother Care which involves almost continuous skin‐to‐skin contact. Design A qualitative descriptive design. Methods An online questionnaire with open‐ended questions was administered to 129 nurses at three neonatal units. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis. Findings Nurses believed they would lose control because of limited access to the infant and would not be able to provide adequate care. Nurses also believed that mothers practicing almost continuous skin‐to‐skin contact would feel trapped and would experience stress if they could not meet the demands of the method. Conclusions Although the nurses can describe several of the documented benefits of almost continuous skin‐to‐skin contact, an underuse continues to exist. Relevance for clinical practice Beliefs described by the nurses are important to consider and resolve if the goal is to implement and provide Kangaroo Mother Care.

Suggested Citation

  • Evalotte Mörelius & Gene Cranston Anderson, 2015. "Neonatal nurses’ beliefs about almost continuous parent–infant skin‐to‐skin contact in neonatal intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2620-2627, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2620-2627
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulla Edéll‐Gustafsson & Charlotte Angelhoff & Ewa Johnsson & Jenny Karlsson & Evalotte Mörelius, 2015. "Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. A phenomenographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 717-727, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingqi Deng & Yao Zhang & Qiufang Li & Hua Wang & Xinfen Xu, 2018. "Factors that have an impact on knowledge, attitude and practice related to kangaroo care: National survey study among neonatal nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4100-4111, November.
    2. Inez Koopman & Jennifer A. Callaghan‐Koru & Oluwatope Alaofin & Cynthia H. Argani & Azadeh Farzin, 2016. "Early skin‐to‐skin contact for healthy full‐term infants after vaginal and caesarean delivery: a qualitative study on clinician perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1367-1376, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlotte Angelhoff & Ulla Edéll‐Gustafsson & Evalotte Mörelius, 2018. "Sleep quality and mood in mothers and fathers accommodated in the family‐centred paediatric ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 544-550, February.
    2. Borghild Løyland & Charlotte Angelhoff & Gudrún Kristjánsdóttir & Hege Sjølie, 2020. "A systematic integrative review of parents' experience and perception of sleep when they stay overnight in the hospital together with their sick children," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 706-719, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2620-2627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.