IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i9-10p1292-1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalised discharge care planning for postmyocardial infarction patients through the use of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol – implementing theory into practice

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Lau‐Walker
  • Anne Landy
  • Trevor Murrells

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aims to evaluate the service impact of the integration of an evidence‐based instrument – the Personalised Patient Education Protocol – into an existing postmyocardial infarction care pathway. Background Recent research indicates that while better patient health outcomes can be achieved when care planning is personalised, delivery staff feel less satisfied and less confident in its provision. To achieve a shift to personalised care, innovations are needed to enable an effective transition for staff. Design A service evaluation using a patient survey and nurse interviews. Method A longitudinal patient survey measured changes in patient illness beliefs, cardiac diet and exercise self‐efficacy, anxiety, depression and quality of life study of a patient cohort of 74. Paired t‐tests analysed the effects before and after the implementation of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol. Cardiac rehabilitation nurses who implemented the Personalised Patient Education Protocol were interviewed and a patient survey identified perceptions of the usefulness of the service innovation. Results Analysis of change from baseline to three months results showed statistically significant changes in Illness Belief component ‘Understanding’ and the Dartmouth Quality of Life ‘General Health’. The integration of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol into the existing discharge process identified service improvements for cardiac nurse training and care pathway delivery, while patients identified the level and frequency of their use of the protocol following discharge. Conclusion The introduction of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol succeeded in increasing patient engagement, facilitated a more patient‐centred service by enabling practitioners to systematically provide personalised patient education, and gave patients a postdischarge structure to better follow‐up their illness concerns with health professionals in the community. Relevance to clinical practice Integration of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol into an existing postmyocardial infarction care pathway enabled nurses to systematically respond to individual patients’ illness beliefs and expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Lau‐Walker & Anne Landy & Trevor Murrells, 2016. "Personalised discharge care planning for postmyocardial infarction patients through the use of the Personalised Patient Education Protocol – implementing theory into practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1292-1300, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1292-1300
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Posadas-Collado & María J. Membrive-Jiménez & José L. Romero-Béjar & José L. Gómez-Urquiza & Luis Albendín-García & Nora Suleiman-Martos & Guillermo A. Cañadas-De La Fuente, 2022. "Continuity of Nursing Care in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1292-1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.