IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p575-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student participation in clinical handover–an integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Malone
  • Judith Anderson
  • Jennifer Manning

Abstract

Aim and objectives To examine the literature exploring the current understanding of student nurse participation in clinical handover whilst they are enrolled in an undergraduate preregistration course. Background The importance of handing over the care of a patient to ensure continuity and safety of care is well‐recognised. Effective preparation of student nurses to competently perform this critical task requires the use of appropriate teaching strategies to support this learning, within undergraduate preregistration nursing programs. Design An integrative literature review. Method An integrative literature review was conducted to establish what is known about student nurse participation in relation to clinical handover. This resulted in 18 articles for inclusion in the literature review. An analysis was then undertaken of these 18 articles to extract key themes. Results Learning and teaching strategies need to address a variety of methods of the clinical handover process including verbal and written handovers. Participating in clinical handover prior to being given the responsibility of patient care prepares students for the workplace. Key themes identified within the literature included: learning strategies, limitations and challenges involved in putting theory into practice, handover structure and issues regarding confidentiality. Conclusion Simulation and clinical practice are commonly used to prepare students for this role during their undergraduate education. The use of simulation and structured handover techniques prior to clinical placement increases student confidence to engage in clinical handovers during their clinical placements. Relevance to clinical practice This article raises the awareness of both clinical staff and educators as to the need for student nurses to develop their skills in clinical handover practice and suggests strategies to prepare student nurses to conduct clinical handover competently in the clinical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Malone & Judith Anderson & Jennifer Manning, 2016. "Student participation in clinical handover–an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 575-582, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:575-582
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne McMurray & Wendy Chaboyer & Marianne Wallis & Cathy Fetherston, 2010. "Implementing bedside handover: strategies for change management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2580-2589, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judith Anderson & Linda Malone & Kerry Shanahan & Jennifer Manning, 2015. "Nursing bedside clinical handover – an integrated review of issues and tools," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 662-671, March.
    2. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Patricia S. Groves & Kirstin A. Manges & Jill Scott-Cawiezell, 2016. "Handing Off Safety at the Bedside," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(5), pages 473-493, October.
    4. Amanda Towell‐Barnard & Susan Slatyer & Helen Cadwallader & Michelle Harvey & Susan Davis, 2020. "The influence of adaptive challenge on engagement of multidisciplinary staff in standardising aseptic technique in an emergency department: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 459-467, February.
    5. Debra Kerr & Kate McKay & Sharon Klim & Anne‐Maree Kelly & Terence McCann, 2014. "Attitudes of emergency department patients about handover at the bedside," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1685-1693, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:575-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.