IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1685-1693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of emergency department patients about handover at the bedside

Author

Listed:
  • Debra Kerr
  • Kate McKay
  • Sharon Klim
  • Anne‐Maree Kelly
  • Terence McCann

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore patients' perspectives of bedside handover by nurses in the emergency department (ED). Background International guidelines promote standardisation in clinical handover. Poor handover can lead to adverse incidents and expose patients to harm. Studies have shown that nurses and patients have favourable opinions about handover that is conducted at the bedside in hospital wards; however, there is a lack of evidence for patients' perspective of nursing handover in the ED environment. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods Semi‐structured interviews with 30 ED patients occurred within one hour of bedside handover. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results Two main themes were identified in the data. First, patients perceive that participating in bedside handover enhances individual care. It provides the opportunity for patients to clarify discrepancies and to contribute further information during the handover process, and is valued by patients. Patients are reassured about the competence of nurses and continuum of care after hearing handover conversations. Second, maintaining privacy and confidentiality during bedside handover is important for patients. Preference was expressed for handover to be conducted in the ED cubicle area to protect privacy of patient information and for discretion to be used with sensitive or new information. Conclusions Bedside handover is an acceptable method of performing handover for patients in the ED who value the opportunity to contribute and clarify information, and are reassured that their information is communicated in a private location. Relevance to clinical practice From the patients' perspective, nursing handover that is performed at the bedside enhances the quality and continuum of care and maintains privacy and confidentiality of information. Nurses should use discretion when dealing with sensitive or new patient information.

Suggested Citation

  • Debra Kerr & Kate McKay & Sharon Klim & Anne‐Maree Kelly & Terence McCann, 2014. "Attitudes of emergency department patients about handover at the bedside," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1685-1693, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1685-1693
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne McMurray & Wendy Chaboyer & Marianne Wallis & Cathy Fetherston, 2010. "Implementing bedside handover: strategies for change management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2580-2589, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judith Anderson & Linda Malone & Kerry Shanahan & Jennifer Manning, 2015. "Nursing bedside clinical handover – an integrated review of issues and tools," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 662-671, March.
    2. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Patricia S. Groves & Kirstin A. Manges & Jill Scott-Cawiezell, 2016. "Handing Off Safety at the Bedside," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(5), pages 473-493, October.
    4. Amanda Towell‐Barnard & Susan Slatyer & Helen Cadwallader & Michelle Harvey & Susan Davis, 2020. "The influence of adaptive challenge on engagement of multidisciplinary staff in standardising aseptic technique in an emergency department: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 459-467, February.
    5. Linda Malone & Judith Anderson & Jennifer Manning, 2016. "Student participation in clinical handover–an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 575-582, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1685-1693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.