IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i3-4p412-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medication administration errors from a nursing viewpoint: a formal consensus of definition and scenarios using a Delphi technique

Author

Listed:
  • Ramzi Shawahna
  • Dina Masri
  • Rawan Al‐Gharabeh
  • Rawan Deek
  • Lama Al‐Thayba
  • Masa Halaweh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and achieve formal consensus on a definition of medication administration errors and scenarios that should or should not be considered as medication administration errors in hospitalised patient settings. Background Medication administration errors occur frequently in hospitalised patient settings. Currently, there is no formal consensus on a definition of medication administration errors or scenarios that should or should not be considered as medication administration errors. Design This was a descriptive study using Delphi technique. Methods A panel of experts (n = 50) recruited from major hospitals, nursing schools and universities in Palestine took part in the study. Three Delphi rounds were followed to achieve consensus on a proposed definition of medication administration errors and a series of 61 scenarios representing potential medication administration error situations formulated into a questionnaire. Results In the first Delphi round, key contact nurses’ views on medication administration errors were explored. In the second Delphi round, consensus was achieved to accept the proposed definition of medication administration errors and to include 36 (59%) scenarios and exclude 1 (1·6%) as medication administration errors. In the third Delphi round, consensus was achieved to consider further 14 (23%) and exclude 2 (3·3%) as medication administration errors while the remaining eight (13·1%) were considered equivocal. Of the 61 scenarios included in the Delphi process, experts decided to include 50 scenarios as medication administration errors, exclude three scenarios and include or exclude eight scenarios depending on the individual clinical situation. Conclusion Consensus on a definition and scenarios representing medication administration errors can be achieved using formal consensus techniques. Relevance to clinical practice Researchers should be aware that using different definitions of medication administration errors, inclusion or exclusion of medication administration error situations could significantly affect the rate of medication administration errors reported in their studies. Consensual definitions and medication administration error situations can be used in future epidemiology studies investigating medication administration errors in hospitalised patient settings which may permit and promote direct comparisons of different studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramzi Shawahna & Dina Masri & Rawan Al‐Gharabeh & Rawan Deek & Lama Al‐Thayba & Masa Halaweh, 2016. "Medication administration errors from a nursing viewpoint: a formal consensus of definition and scenarios using a Delphi technique," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 412-423, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:412-423
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeongeun Kim & David W Bates, 2013. "Medication administration errors by nurses: adherence to guidelines," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 590-598, February.
    2. Janet Choo & Linda Johnston & Elizabeth Manias, 2013. "Nurses' medication administration practices at two Singaporean acute care hospitals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 101-108, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marja Härkänen & Marjo Kervinen & Jouni Ahonen & Hannele Turunen & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015. "An observational study of how patients are identified before medication administrations in medical and surgical wards," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 188-194, June.
    2. Marja Härkänen & Alwiena Blignaut & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2018. "Focus group discussions of registered nurses’ perceptions of challenges in the medication administration process," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 431-437, December.
    3. Marja Härkänen & Maijaterttu Tiainen & Kaisa Haatainen, 2018. "Wrong‐patient incidents during medication administrations," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 715-724, February.
    4. Marja Härkänen & Susanna Saano & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2017. "Using incident reports to inform the prevention of medication administration errors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3486-3499, November.
    5. Marja Härkänen & Kaisa Haatainen & Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen & Merja Miettinen, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence for Identifying the Prevention of Medication Incidents Causing Serious or Moderate Harm: An Analysis Using Incident Reporters’ Views," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Shahrzad Salmasi & Tahir Mehmood Khan & Yet Hoi Hong & Long Chiau Ming & Tin Wui Wong, 2015. "Medication Errors in the Southeast Asian Countries: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Xi Yu & Ce Li & Xueqin Gao & Furong Liu & Ping Lin, 2018. "Influence of the medication environment on the unsafe medication behaviour of nurses: A path analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2993-3000, August.
    8. Chu, Amanda M.Y. & Omori, Yasuhiro & So, Hing-yu & So, Mike K.P., 2023. "A Multivariate Randomized Response Model for Sensitive Binary Data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 16-35.
    9. Marja Härkänen & Marjo Kervinen & Jouni Ahonen & Ari Voutilainen & Hannele Turunen & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015. "Patient‐specific risk factors of adverse drug events in adult inpatients – evidence detected using the Global Trigger Tool method," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 582-591, February.
    10. Mei‐Juan Lan & Ling‐Ling Zhu & Quan Zhou, 2014. "Medication administration errors made by nurses reflect the level of pharmacy administration and hospital information infrastructure," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 894-895, March.
    11. Alwiena J Blignaut & Siedine K Coetzee & Hester C Klopper & Suria M Ellis, 2017. "Medication administration errors and related deviations from safe practice: an observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3610-3623, November.
    12. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Susanna Tella & Patricia A. Logan & Jayden Khakurel & Flores Vizcaya-Moreno, 2020. "Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:412-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.