IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p582-591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient‐specific risk factors of adverse drug events in adult inpatients – evidence detected using the Global Trigger Tool method

Author

Listed:
  • Marja Härkänen
  • Marjo Kervinen
  • Jouni Ahonen
  • Ari Voutilainen
  • Hannele Turunen
  • Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify the prevalence, preventability, and severity of adverse drug events in randomly selected adult hospital inpatients, and to study the association between adverse drug events and patient‐specific factors. Background Adverse drug events represent one of the major concerns in patient safety. Design A retrospective record review. Methods The study was conducted in an 800‐bed university hospital in Finland within a 12‐month period. Retrospective reviews of randomly selected discharged patients' (n = 463) records using the Global Trigger Tool method were undertaken. The prevalence, preventability, and severity of adverse drug events were studied, and the association between patient‐specific factors and adverse drug events were examined using a binary logistic regression model and Pearson's chi‐squared tests. Results A total of 180 adverse drug events were detected in 125 (27%) patients, of which 74 (41·1%) were preventable, and 94·4% caused temporary harm. An abnormal level of potassium in the blood was the most frequent adverse drug event (n = 37). The risk of adverse drug events increased with the length of hospital stay and the increased number of drugs patients used. The patients with coronary diseases (n = 130) had a 2·5 times higher risk of experiencing adverse drug events. In addition, the risk of adverse drug events during hospitalisation increased together with the co‐morbidity of patients. Conclusions Adverse drug events were experienced by a quarter of inpatients, while severe adverse drug events were rare. The risk of adverse drug events increased with patients' prolonged hospital stay, polypharmacy, and morbidity. In addition, information of the usefulness of the Global Trigger tool can be used for future development of the method. Relevance to clinical practice Patient‐specific risk factors were identified using the Global Trigger Tool method revealing that more efficient monitoring of inpatients with these risk factors may be profitable for decreasing adverse drug events.

Suggested Citation

  • Marja Härkänen & Marjo Kervinen & Jouni Ahonen & Ari Voutilainen & Hannele Turunen & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015. "Patient‐specific risk factors of adverse drug events in adult inpatients – evidence detected using the Global Trigger Tool method," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 582-591, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:582-591
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeongeun Kim & David W Bates, 2013. "Medication administration errors by nurses: adherence to guidelines," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 590-598, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marja Härkänen & Maijaterttu Tiainen & Kaisa Haatainen, 2018. "Wrong‐patient incidents during medication administrations," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 715-724, February.
    2. Marja Härkänen & Susanna Saano & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2017. "Using incident reports to inform the prevention of medication administration errors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3486-3499, November.
    3. Marja Härkänen & Kaisa Haatainen & Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen & Merja Miettinen, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence for Identifying the Prevention of Medication Incidents Causing Serious or Moderate Harm: An Analysis Using Incident Reporters’ Views," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Marja Härkänen & Marjo Kervinen & Jouni Ahonen & Hannele Turunen & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015. "An observational study of how patients are identified before medication administrations in medical and surgical wards," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 188-194, June.
    5. Xi Yu & Ce Li & Xueqin Gao & Furong Liu & Ping Lin, 2018. "Influence of the medication environment on the unsafe medication behaviour of nurses: A path analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2993-3000, August.
    6. Marja Härkänen & Alwiena Blignaut & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2018. "Focus group discussions of registered nurses’ perceptions of challenges in the medication administration process," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 431-437, December.
    7. Chu, Amanda M.Y. & Omori, Yasuhiro & So, Hing-yu & So, Mike K.P., 2023. "A Multivariate Randomized Response Model for Sensitive Binary Data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 16-35.
    8. Mei‐Juan Lan & Ling‐Ling Zhu & Quan Zhou, 2014. "Medication administration errors made by nurses reflect the level of pharmacy administration and hospital information infrastructure," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 894-895, March.
    9. Ramzi Shawahna & Dina Masri & Rawan Al‐Gharabeh & Rawan Deek & Lama Al‐Thayba & Masa Halaweh, 2016. "Medication administration errors from a nursing viewpoint: a formal consensus of definition and scenarios using a Delphi technique," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 412-423, February.
    10. Alwiena J Blignaut & Siedine K Coetzee & Hester C Klopper & Suria M Ellis, 2017. "Medication administration errors and related deviations from safe practice: an observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3610-3623, November.
    11. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Susanna Tella & Patricia A. Logan & Jayden Khakurel & Flores Vizcaya-Moreno, 2020. "Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:582-591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.