IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2305-2316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of frail index and quality of life among community‐dwelling older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Shu‐Fang Chang
  • Gi‐Mi Wen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the independent effect of frailty on quality of life. Background The World Health Organisation has proposed that frailty be used to indicate a lack of successful ageing. However, studies investigating the relationship between frail phenotypes and quality of life are lacking. Design This research employed a cross‐sectional design. Methods The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index was used based on the following three criteria: unexpected weight loss, inability to rise from a chair without using the armrests five times, and feeling a lack of energy. Participants who fulfilled more than two, one or zero criteria were considered as frail, prefrail or robust respectively. Moreover, this study used the Taiwanese version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life‐BREF to assess the quality of life of older people. A multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the independent effect of frail status on each quality of life subscale. Results A total of 239 older people [average age = 74·77 years; standard deviation = 7·02 years; 104 males (43·5%) and 135 females (56·5%)] participated in this study. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the older people who were more advanced in age and had been diagnosed with a greater number of chronic diseases had a lower comprehensive quality of life. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index was associated only with the environmental domain of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life‐BREF. Conclusions Compared with robust and prefrail older people, frail older people have worse biomarkers, health statuses, and quality of life. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index was correlated only with the quality of life environmental domain. Relevance to clinical practice Professional nurses must understand the differences among frail, prefrail and robust older people with regard to their biomarkers, health status, and quality of life. In addition, a comprehensive nursing intervention programme must be developed to improve the quality of life of older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu‐Fang Chang & Gi‐Mi Wen, 2016. "Association of frail index and quality of life among community‐dwelling older adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2305-2316, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2305-2316
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13248
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith M. Mitchell & Bryan J. Kemp, 2000. "Quality of Life in Assisted Living Homes," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(2), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graeme D Smith & Angela Kydd, 2017. "Editorial: Getting care of older people right: the need for appropriate frailty assessment?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 5-6, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrews, Gavin J. & Cutchin, Malcolm & McCracken, Kevin & Phillips, David R. & Wiles, Janine, 2007. "Geographical Gerontology: The constitution of a discipline," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 151-168, July.
    2. Shiwang Yu & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui & Bo Xia, 2019. "Influence of Outdoor Living Environment on Elders’ Quality of Life in Old Residential Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Yu-Hua Wang & Li-Fan Liu & Ling-Hui Chang & Chien-Hsin Yeh, 2019. "The Implementation of Restorative Care and Factors Associated with Resident Outcomes in Long-Term Care Facilities in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Amy L. Silva-Smith & Mary Ann Kluge & Michelle LeCompte & Alison Snook, 2013. "Improving Staff Reports of Falls in Assisted Living," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 448-460, November.
    5. Aria C. H. Yang & Habib Chaudhury & Jeffrey C. F. Ho & Newman Lau, 2023. "Measuring the Impact of Bedroom Privacy on Social Networks in a Long-Term Care Facility for Hong Kong Older Adults: A Spatio-Social Network Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Elena ZODIERIU, 2015. "A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS REGARDING THE DEGREE OF SATISFACTION OF THE SERVICES GIVEN BY THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CARE HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY Abstract : In the context of economic and social realities of our," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 4(Special I), pages 1-16, august.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2305-2316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.