IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ecofrm/v4y2015is1p16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS REGARDING THE DEGREE OF SATISFACTION OF THE SERVICES GIVEN BY THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CARE HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY Abstract : In the context of economic and social realities of our country, more and more elderly choose to spend the last years of his life in homes for the elderly. Reasons for choosing this path are many, but the most important is the lack of support and the need for personal care companions. These two reasons were cited by the elderly from the study, adding that they do not want to be a burden for their children. One of the problems encountered when an elderly person decides to enter a home is the dilemma of choosing a public or private care home. In these circumstances, the present study aims to present the public-private comparative perspective, the realities of the homes of the elderly both in terms of material and human conditions and the satisfaction of the beneficiaries of these homes

Author

Listed:
  • Elena ZODIERIU

    (Eugen Lovinescu High School, Romania)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena ZODIERIU, 2015. "A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS REGARDING THE DEGREE OF SATISFACTION OF THE SERVICES GIVEN BY THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CARE HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY Abstract : In the context of economic and social realities of our," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 4(Special I), pages 1-16, august.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ecofrm:v:4:y:2015:i:s1:p:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecoforumjournal.ro/index.php/eco/article/download/227/138
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith M. Mitchell & Bryan J. Kemp, 2000. "Quality of Life in Assisted Living Homes," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(2), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Hua Wang & Li-Fan Liu & Ling-Hui Chang & Chien-Hsin Yeh, 2019. "The Implementation of Restorative Care and Factors Associated with Resident Outcomes in Long-Term Care Facilities in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Amy L. Silva-Smith & Mary Ann Kluge & Michelle LeCompte & Alison Snook, 2013. "Improving Staff Reports of Falls in Assisted Living," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 448-460, November.
    3. Andrews, Gavin J. & Cutchin, Malcolm & McCracken, Kevin & Phillips, David R. & Wiles, Janine, 2007. "Geographical Gerontology: The constitution of a discipline," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 151-168, July.
    4. Aria C. H. Yang & Habib Chaudhury & Jeffrey C. F. Ho & Newman Lau, 2023. "Measuring the Impact of Bedroom Privacy on Social Networks in a Long-Term Care Facility for Hong Kong Older Adults: A Spatio-Social Network Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Shu‐Fang Chang & Gi‐Mi Wen, 2016. "Association of frail index and quality of life among community‐dwelling older adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2305-2316, August.
    6. Shiwang Yu & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui & Bo Xia, 2019. "Influence of Outdoor Living Environment on Elders’ Quality of Life in Old Residential Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ecofrm:v:4:y:2015:i:s1:p:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iulian Condratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.