IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i9-10p1174-1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the transition experiences of students entering into preregistration nursing degree programs with previous professional nursing qualifications: an integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Tower
  • Marie Cooke
  • Bernadette Watson
  • Nick Buys
  • Keithia Wilson

Abstract

Aims and objectives This paper aims to investigate the transition experiences of students with previous nursing qualifications (nondegree qualifications) entering a nursing degree program. Background Nurses with professional nursing qualifications (nondegree) are an important pool of professionals to draw on to help address nursing shortages through providing alternative pathways to becoming registered nurses. However, research suggests this cohort need higher levels of support and intervention to be successful. Design An integrative review was conducted, guided by Whittemore and Knafl's framework. A comprehensive search was conducted and 14 studies were included in the review. Methods A five‐stage approach was used to conduct the review: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation of results. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify commonalities, differences and themes in the relevant literature. Results Themes emerged that suggested students struggled with academic and institutional challenges, becoming learners, managing conflicting demands of outside life, developing a student identity and experienced threat to their sense of professional identity. Additionally, the cohort did not view themselves as ‘the same’ as traditional students. Holland's framework provides a useful framework from which to conceptualise these students' experiences. Conclusion There are challenges for this cohort of students as they transition into degree level study. Supportive activities that extend and further develop students' personality orientations may be a useful starting point in addressing some of the challenges and providing a more positive transition to university. Relevance to clinical practice The demand for health care is growing and there remains a shortfall of registered nurses. Nurses with professional qualifications (nondegree) are an important pool of professionals from which to increase registered nurse numbers and address workforce sustainability issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Tower & Marie Cooke & Bernadette Watson & Nick Buys & Keithia Wilson, 2015. "Exploring the transition experiences of students entering into preregistration nursing degree programs with previous professional nursing qualifications: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(9-10), pages 1174-1188, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:9-10:p:1174-1188
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan Cameron & Michelle Roxburgh & Julie Taylor & William Lauder, 2011. "An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: why do students stay?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1372-1382, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xian-Liang Liu & Tao Wang & Daniel Bressington & Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig & Lolita Wikander & Jing-Yu (Benjamin) Tan, 2023. "Factors Influencing Retention among Regional, Rural and Remote Undergraduate Nursing Students in Australia: A Systematic Review of Current Research Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:9-10:p:1174-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.