IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1372-1382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: why do students stay?

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Cameron
  • Michelle Roxburgh
  • Julie Taylor
  • William Lauder

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The purpose of the review was to identify student characteristics and strategies in research studies investigating retention (why students stay) as opposed to attrition (why students leave) nursing and midwifery preregistration programmes. Background. Retention in nursing and midwifery programmes is a serious international problem. Many governments are committed to diversifying both the student population and the health care workforce. This has led to higher education institutes in some countries offering places on nursing and midwifery programmes to students with non‐traditional entry qualifications. There are suggestions that the policy of widening access has contributed to the challenges of retention in nursing and midwifery programmes. Design. Integrative literature review. Method. Undertaken using electronic databases and specific search terms, 15 articles were identified and reviewed. The critical appraisal tools produced by CASP (2009) were used to evaluate the quality of the data. Findings from the identified research literature were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results. Two broad themes emerged from the analysis: Programme and Personal. Subthemes were identified in these that give clues as to why students stay: profession, support, student characteristics and family. Conclusions. Personal commitment and good support seem to be essential for students to remain on undergraduate programmes of nursing and midwifery. The term ‘support’ is rarely explicit and requires to be more clearly defined. Furthermore, studies reviewed fail to indicate clearly how to identify when students are most vulnerable and which interventions are most appropriate in different situations in supporting retaining students on programmes. Relevance to clinical practice. Nursing and midwifery student retention is a political and professional problem. Collaboration between clinical placement providers, academic institutions, students and their families is required to address the issue. Illumination of factors that help students stay may help us devise interventions that prevent future students leaving.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Cameron & Michelle Roxburgh & Julie Taylor & William Lauder, 2011. "An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: why do students stay?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1372-1382, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1372-1382
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03336.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03336.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03336.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xian-Liang Liu & Tao Wang & Daniel Bressington & Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig & Lolita Wikander & Jing-Yu (Benjamin) Tan, 2023. "Factors Influencing Retention among Regional, Rural and Remote Undergraduate Nursing Students in Australia: A Systematic Review of Current Research Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Marion Tower & Marie Cooke & Bernadette Watson & Nick Buys & Keithia Wilson, 2015. "Exploring the transition experiences of students entering into preregistration nursing degree programs with previous professional nursing qualifications: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(9-10), pages 1174-1188, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1372-1382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.