IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i7-8p1091-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a better understanding of readmissions after stroke: partnering with stroke survivors and caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Carole L White
  • Tracy L Brady
  • Laura L Saucedo
  • Deb Motz
  • Johanna Sharp
  • Lee A Birnbaum

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the experience of readmission from the perspective of the stroke survivor and family caregiver. Background Older stroke survivors are at an increased risk for readmission with approximately 40% being readmitted in the first year after stroke. Patients and their families are best positioned to provide information about factors associated with readmission, yet their perspectives have rarely been elicited. Design Descriptive qualitative study. Methods This study included older stroke survivors who were readmitted to acute care from home in the six months following stroke, and their family caregivers. Participants were interviewed by telephone at approximately two weeks after discharge and a sub‐set was also interviewed in person during the readmission. Interviews were audio‐taped and content analysis was used to identify themes. Results From the 29 semi‐structured interviews conducted with 20 stroke survivors and/or their caregivers, the following themes were identified: preparing to go home after the stroke, what to expect at home, complexity of medication management, support for self‐care in the community and the influence of social factors. Conclusions This study provides the critical perspective of the stroke survivor and family caregiver into furthering our understanding of readmissions after stroke. Participants identified several areas for intervention including better discharge preparation and the need for support in the community for medication management and self‐care. The findings suggest that interventions designed to reduce readmissions after stroke should be multifaceted in approach and extend across the continuum of care. Relevance to clinical practice The hospital level has been the focus of interventions to reduce preventable readmissions, but the results of this study suggest the importance of community‐level care. The individual nature of each situation must be taken into account, including the postdischarge environment and the availability of social support.

Suggested Citation

  • Carole L White & Tracy L Brady & Laura L Saucedo & Deb Motz & Johanna Sharp & Lee A Birnbaum, 2015. "Towards a better understanding of readmissions after stroke: partnering with stroke survivors and caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1091-1100, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1091-1100
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kucukyazici, Beste & Verter, Vedat & Nadeau, Lyne & Mayo, Nancy E., 2009. "Improving post-stroke health outcomes: Can facilitated care help?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(2-3), pages 180-187, December.
    2. Catarina Wallengren & Kerstin Segesten & Febe Friberg, 2010. "Relatives’ information needs and the characteristics of their search for information – in the words of relatives of stroke survivors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2888-2896, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1091-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.