IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i19-20p2888-2896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relatives’ information needs and the characteristics of their search for information – in the words of relatives of stroke survivors

Author

Listed:
  • Catarina Wallengren
  • Kerstin Segesten
  • Febe Friberg

Abstract

Aim and objectives. To explore relatives’ information needs and the characteristics of their information‐seeking process shortly after the stroke event and six months later. Background. Providing relatives of stroke survivors with information is important, as lack of information increases their uncertainty and risk becoming the ‘second patient in the family’ and early death. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of relatives’ information needs and information‐seeking process the first six months after stroke. Design. This qualitative study has a descriptive design. Method. Open‐ended interviews were conducted with sixteen relatives after stroke survivor’s admission to stroke unit and six months later with nine of these relatives. Data were analysed by means of content analysis. Results. The identified information needs covered the spectrum from stroke survivor’s medical condition because nurses’ actions to relatives’ changed health and life situation. Furthermore, relatives’ information‐seeking process was found to be related to their level of personal involvement, situational circumstances, different forms of knowledge and sources of information. Conclusions. Relatives’ search for information emerges when health and lifestyle changes occur in survivors or themselves. It is important that this information affect them personally. Also, they need to develop different forms of knowledge when they cannot trust their own competences. As a result, instead of following established curricula based on their beliefs of relatives’ information needs, nurses need to practice on identifying relatives’ information needs. Relevance to practice. Different information needs and characteristics described in the study can serve as guidance in the development and implementation of pedagogical interventions to support relatives of stroke survivors. One pedagogical implication is to explore what a specific relative wants to know by how he/she talks or thinks about it. Thus, it must be taken into consideration that level of personal involvement, situational circumstances, sources of information and factual knowledge, understanding and skills are intertwined.

Suggested Citation

  • Catarina Wallengren & Kerstin Segesten & Febe Friberg, 2010. "Relatives’ information needs and the characteristics of their search for information – in the words of relatives of stroke survivors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2888-2896, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2888-2896
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03259.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03259.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03259.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carole L White & Tracy L Brady & Laura L Saucedo & Deb Motz & Johanna Sharp & Lee A Birnbaum, 2015. "Towards a better understanding of readmissions after stroke: partnering with stroke survivors and caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1091-1100, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2888-2896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.