Author
Listed:
- Sharon Andrew
- Andrew McVicar
- Mandana Zanganeh
- Nigel Henderson
Abstract
Aims and objectives To examine nursing, midwifery and allied healthcare students' self‐efficacy for science, perceived relevance of bioscience to their studies and expectations for academic success and the changes that occur after completing first‐year introductory bioscience subjects. Background Bioscience is a foundation subject that underpins nursing, midwifery and other allied health courses. Bioscience subjects continue to be source of anxiety for students in those courses. Raising students' self‐efficacy and perceptions of the importance and utility of bioscience to practice may be a way of ameliorating students' expectations and confidence in this subject area. Design A prospective correlational survey design. Methods Students were surveyed in the first semester of first year and the commencement of the second year. Students were drawn from nursing, midwifery, public health and allied health courses. The surveys contained scales for self‐efficacy for science, perceived relevance of bioscience to their course and personal expectations for success in their bioscience subject. Results Ninety‐seven and 82 students completed survey 1 and 2 respectively. Twenty‐six surveys could be matched. Self‐efficacy increased from survey 1 to survey 2, but expectations for academic success and task value, a measure for relevance, were lower. This was statistically significant for the matched pair sample. Using a mean split, students with high self‐efficacy valued science more and had higher expectations for success in their bioscience courses than those with low self‐efficacy. Conclusion Academic success in bioscience, confidence undertaking science tasks and perceiving bioscience as relevant to their course are interwoven concepts that are important for nursing, midwifery and applied healthcare students and ultimately for their professional practice. Relevance to clinical practice Literature indicates practitioners may not feel confident in their bioscience knowledge. Assisting undergraduate students to develop confidence in and perceive the relevance of bioscience to their discipline may ultimately impact on clinical practice.
Suggested Citation
Sharon Andrew & Andrew McVicar & Mandana Zanganeh & Nigel Henderson, 2015.
"Self‐efficacy and relevance of bioscience for nursing, midwifery and healthcare students,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2965-2972, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2965-2972
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12933
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Federica Dellafiore & Cristina Arrigoni & Greta Ghizzardi & Irene Baroni & Gianluca Conte & Francesca Turrini & Gianluca Castiello & Arianna Magon & Francesco Pittella & Rosario Caruso, 2019.
"Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self‐efficacy scale for nurses,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3177-3188, September.
- Kari Toverud Jensen & Unni Knutstad & Tonks N. Fawcett, 2018.
"The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature review,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1793-1802, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2965-2972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.