IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p1044-1054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functioning assessment vs. conventional medical assessment: a comparative study on health professionals' clinical decision‐making and the fit with patient's own perspective of health

Author

Listed:
  • Hillegonda A Stallinga
  • Petrie F Roodbol
  • Coby Annema
  • Gerard J Jansen
  • Klaske Wynia

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare a functioning assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with a conventional medical assessment, in terms of their respective consequences for health professionals' clinical decision‐making and the fit with patient's own perspective of health. Background In chronic diseases, pathogenic‐oriented health care falls short in generating all the information required for determining healthcare provision to improve health. A broader, so‐called salutogenic approach, by using the ICF, focusing on how to stay healthy, rather than on what causes diseases, seems more appropriate. Design A cross‐sectional comparative study using data from a randomised controlled trial. Methods Data about patient problems and professional healthcare activities were collected from a total of 81 patients with severe multiple sclerosis who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ICF group, assessed with a functioning assessment (n = 43), and the medical group, assessed with a conventional medical assessment (n = 38). Data were analysed statistically using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results A functioning assessment resulted in the registration of significantly more patient problems in the health components ‘participation’ and ‘environmental factors’, as well as significantly more professional healthcare activities befitting these components. The ICF group had a significant positive correlation between registered problems by health professionals and patients' self‐reported problems, whereas the medical group had several negative correlations. Conclusion A functioning assessment resulted in a care plan that not only was broader and more complete but also reflected the patients' self‐reported problems more closely than a medical assessment, without a loss of focus on medical problems. Relevance to clinical practice This study has shown that some health problems remain unnoticed by a medical assessment alone, which is especially important for the chronically ill. A functioning assessment provides a strong foundation for identifying all relevant information related to health.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillegonda A Stallinga & Petrie F Roodbol & Coby Annema & Gerard J Jansen & Klaske Wynia, 2014. "Functioning assessment vs. conventional medical assessment: a comparative study on health professionals' clinical decision‐making and the fit with patient's own perspective of health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1044-1054, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1044-1054
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12266
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 374-377, June.
    2. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 138-140, February.
    3. Anonymous, 1948. "World Health Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 540-542, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Odelia Koh & Jeannette Lee & Maudrene L S Tan & E-Shyong Tai & Ce Jin Foo & Kok Joon Chong & Su-Yen Goh & Yong Mong Bee & Julian Thumboo & Yin-Bun Cheung & Avjeet Singh & Hwee-Lin Wee, 2014. "Establishing the Thematic Framework for a Diabetes-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Item Bank for Use in an English-Speaking Asian Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Viola, Lora Anne, 2008. "WHO says competition is healthy: How civil society can change IGOs [Die WHO sagt: Wettbewerb ist gesund. Wie Zivilgesellschaft IGOs verändern kann]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    4. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Völker, Sebastian & Kistemann, Thomas, 2013. "Reprint of: “I'm always entirely happy when I'm here!” Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 141-152.
    6. Jozef Bavoľár & Oľga Orosová, 2015. "Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(1), pages 115-122, January.
    7. Roberto Adriani, 2019. "The Evolution of Fake News and the Abuse of Emerging Technologies," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejss_v2_i.
    8. Amaresh Panda & Sanjay Mohapatra, 2021. "Online Healthcare Practices and Associated Stakeholders: Review of Literature for Future Research Agenda," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(2), pages 71-85, June.
    9. Tim Lomas & Kate Hefferon & Itai Ivtzan, 2015. "The LIFE Model: A Meta-Theoretical Conceptual Map for Applied Positive Psychology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1347-1364, October.
    10. Jeanne Landgraf, 2001. "Measuring and monitoring quality of life in children and youth: A brief commentary," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 46(5), pages 281-282, September.
    11. Rock, Melanie J. & Degeling, Chris, 2015. "Public health ethics and more-than-human solidarity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 61-67.
    12. Çevik, Tuğçe, 2020. "Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on General Health Status," MPRA Paper 101346, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Gulshan Kumar & Jagmohan Singh, 2020. "Health Infrastructure Disparities in Punjab: An Inter-district Analysis," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(1), pages 25-38, June.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:115-122 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gibson, Barbara E. & Secker, Barbara & Rolfe, Debbie & Wagner, Frank & Parke, Bob & Mistry, Bhavnita, 2012. "Disability and dignity-enabling home environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 211-219.
    16. Corey L. M. Keyes & Malik Muhammad Sohail & Nneka Jebose Molokwu & Heather Parnell & Cyrilla Amanya & Venkata Gopala Krishna Kaza & Yohannes Benyam Saddo & Vanroth Vann & Senti Tzudier & Rae Jean Proe, 2021. "How Would You Describe a Mentally Healthy Person? A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Orphans and Separated Children," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1719-1743, April.
    17. Willard G. Manning, Jr. & Joseph P. Newhouse & John E. Ware, Jr., 1982. "The Status of Health in Demand Estimation; or, Beyond Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Aspects of Health, pages 141-184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Bruns, Diedrich & Münderlein, Daniel, 2018. ""Paysage à votre santé". Gesundheitsfördernde Landschaften - Eine Betrachtung von Naturparken," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Weber, Florian & Weber, Friedericke & Jenal, Corinna (ed.), Wohin des Weges? Regionalentwicklung in Grossschutzgebieten, volume 21, pages 250-281, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    19. Stephen Birkett & David Rapport, 1998. "A framework for identifying and classifyingecosystem dysfunctions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 15-25, March.
    20. Stronach, Megan & Maxwell, Hazel & Pearce, Sonya, 2019. "Indigenous Australian women promoting health through sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 5-20.
    21. Asfaw, Abay & Klasen, Stephan & Lamanna, Francesca, 2007. "Intra-household Gender Disparities in Children’s Medical Care before Death in India," IZA Discussion Papers 2586, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1044-1054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.