IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i19-20p2854-2863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Kari Sand‐Jecklin
  • Jay Sherman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To quantify quantitative outcomes of a practice change to a blended form of bedside nursing report. Background The literature identifies several benefits of bedside nursing shift report. However, published studies have not adequately quantified outcomes related to this process change, having either small or unreported sample sizes or not testing for statistical significance. Design Quasi‐experimental pre‐ and postimplementation design. Methods Seven medical‐surgical units in a large university hospital implemented a blend of recorded and bedside nursing report. Outcomes monitored included patient and nursing satisfaction, patient falls, nursing overtime and medication errors. Results We found statistically significant improvements postimplementation in four patient survey items specifically impacted by the change to bedside report. Nursing perceptions of report were significantly improved in the areas of patient safety and involvement in care and nurse accountability postimplementation. However, there was a decline in nurse perception that report took a reasonable amount of time after bedside report implementation; contrary to these perceptions, there was no significant increase in nurse overtime. Patient falls at shift change decreased substantially after the implementation of bedside report. An intervening variable during the study period invalidated the comparison of medication errors pre‐ and postintervention. There was some indication from both patients and nurses that bedside report was not always consistently implemented. Conclusions Several positive outcomes were documented in relation to the implementation of a blended bedside shift report, with few drawbacks. Nurse attitudes about report at the final data collection were more positive than at the initial postimplementation data collection. Relevance to clinical practice If properly implemented, nursing bedside report can result in improved patient and nursing satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. However, managers should involve staff nurses in the implementation process and continue to monitor consistency in report format as well as satisfaction with the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kari Sand‐Jecklin & Jay Sherman, 2014. "A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2854-2863, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2854-2863
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kullberg & Lena Sharp & Hemming Johansson & Yvonne Brandberg & Mia Bergenmar, 2019. "Improved patient satisfaction 2 years after introducing person‐centred handover in an oncological inpatient care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3262-3270, September.
    2. Mary F. Forde & Alice Coffey & Josephine Hegarty, 2020. "Bedside handover at the change of nursing shift: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3731-3742, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2854-2863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.