IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i19-20p2844-2853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The challenges of health professionals in meeting the needs of vulnerable patients undergoing chemotherapy: a focus group study

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Witham
  • Carol Haigh
  • Sharon Foy

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore health professionals' perceptions of the needs of patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer. Background Patients with vulnerabilities face additional challenges. People with learning difficulties are often protected from even basic cancer information; patients with severe mental illness are open to structural discrimination with limited access to diagnostic and treatment services. There is also a much poorer survival rate after a cancer diagnosis for patients living with dementia. Design A qualitative design was used. Methods A focus group design was undertaken for this project using a narrative analytical approach revealing how narrative tales are presented and performed. Eighteen healthcare workers were recruited from a regional oncology centre in North West England. Two focus groups were conducted with nine participants in each. The data were collected from late 2011–2012. Results Participants were primarily focused on getting patients through treatment. The identification of vulnerability was an ‘extra’ complication and one that in practice was difficult to define/categorise. The participants appreciated the wider inclusion of family and friends to support vulnerable patients although they felt formalised health care was not particularly facilitative of this process. There were difficulties in achieving support for complex patient needs in the presence of a target driven culture. Conclusions Healthcare professionals need wider managerial and cultural support in meeting the needs of vulnerable patients. There appeared to be a tendency by healthcare professionals to minimise the inherent coping abilities of vulnerable patients. Relevance to clinical practice There is a clear need to support health professionals in providing appropriate resources in order to address the complex needs of vulnerable patients. This requires a cultural shift away from targets and an investment into greater resources for effective multidisciplinary working.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Witham & Carol Haigh & Sharon Foy, 2014. "The challenges of health professionals in meeting the needs of vulnerable patients undergoing chemotherapy: a focus group study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2844-2853, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2844-2853
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Gorp, Baldwin & Vercruysse, Tom, 2012. "Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: A framing analysis of media content," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1274-1281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Rebecca & Harkins, Kristin & Cary, Mark & Sankar, Pamela & Karlawish, Jason, 2015. "The relative contributions of disease label and disease prognosis to Alzheimer's stigma: A vignette-based experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 117-127.
    2. Ribeiro, Barbara & Hartley, Sarah & Nerlich, Brigitte & Jaspal, Rusi, 2018. "Media coverage of the Zika crisis in Brazil: The construction of a ‘war’ frame that masked social and gender inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 137-144.
    3. Jian Xu & Yongrong Cao, 2019. "The image of Beijing in Europe: findings from The Times, Le Figaro, Der Spiegel from 2000 to 2015," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 185-197, September.
    4. Fátima Cuadrado & Lucia Lackova & Marina Mikulajová & Adoración Antolí & Veronika Boleková & Michal Gellen & Julia Vacas, 2023. "Framing influence of emotions and attitudes towards Alzheimer’s disease on Slovak and Spanish laypersons: a cross-cultural approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Jens‐Uwe Wunderlich, 2020. "Positioning as Normative Actors: China and the EU in Climate Change Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1107-1123, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2844-2853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.