IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p479-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caregivers’ work satisfaction and individualised care in care settings for older people

Author

Listed:
  • Riitta Suhonen
  • Andreas Charalambous
  • Minna Stolt
  • Jouko Katajisto
  • Markku Puro

Abstract

Aim and objectives. To examine the association between caregivers’ work satisfaction and individualised care in different care settings for older people. Background. Work satisfaction in older people care settings has been associated with absenteeism, staff turnover and the quality of care delivered. The management of individuality is an important quality of care issue. Although these two issues are important there is little evidence about the possible association between them. Design. An exploratory and correlational survey design. Methods. Data were collected using three questionnaires, the Individualised Care Instrument the Individualised Care Scale‐Nurse and the Index of Work Satisfaction from a sample of professional nursing caregivers (n = 263, response rate 71%) in care settings for older people in one health care area in Finland in 2010. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, correlations, analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis. Results. Caregivers support the patient’s individuality through specific activities, perceiving that they maintain individuality in care provision whilst reporting moderate work satisfaction. The ratings of individuality assessments were the lowest in nursing homes followed by long‐term care in in‐patient wards. There were statistically significant correlations between work satisfaction and specific perceptions in the support of individuality. The sub‐scales of the instruments used were: the Support of Individuality in general, Individuality in the Care Provided, Knowing the Person, Staff‐to‐Resident Communication and Staff‐to‐Staff Communication. Significant statistical differences in the results were found between staff working in home care, primary health care, in‐patient wards and nursing homes. Conclusions. Low job satisfaction can affect the provision of individualised care emphasising the need to promote individualised care at an organisational level as a means of improving work satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice. Instruments to measure work satisfaction and individualised care can be used to improve care quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Riitta Suhonen & Andreas Charalambous & Minna Stolt & Jouko Katajisto & Markku Puro, 2013. "Caregivers’ work satisfaction and individualised care in care settings for older people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 479-490, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:479-490
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04052.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04052.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04052.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Lan & Xu Liu & Xiantong Zhao & Zhen Liang, 2024. "Visible and invisible factors affecting the job satisfaction of agency home caregivers in the UK," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:479-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.