IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i23-24p3492-3502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impaired sexual function and prostate cancer: a mixed method investigation into the experiences of men and their partners

Author

Listed:
  • Peter K O'Shaughnessy
  • Colin Ireland
  • Lemuel Pelentsov
  • Laws A Thomas
  • Adrian J Esterman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore issues related to sexual function and relationships, for men and their wives or partners, following diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. Background A diagnosis of prostate cancer and subsequent treatment result in a significant number of men experiencing some impairment to their sexual function. There is scant research into the impact of changed sexual function on these men's masculinity, sexuality, intimate relationships and their needs regarding counselling and supportive care. Design Internet‐based survey. Methods Focus groups and couple interviews were used to improve validity for questionnaire items designed to provide insight into men's experiences of prostate cancer in areas such as sexual function and relationships. The questionnaire included both closed and open‐ended questions and had the option for the wife or partner to complete a section. Results Qualitative research revealed 17 specific categories within three key themes: sexual dysfunction, loss of libido and masculinity. The questionnaire found, unexpectedly, the majority of men said that they had sufficient emotional and psychological support. Wives/partners confirmed cancer had impacted on their partner's feelings of masculinity (71%), compared to 42% of men who felt that this was the case. Predictors of loss of libido, erectile dysfunction and ‘feeling less of a man’ were developed. Univariate predictors included hormone therapy, regrets about treatment choice, cancer having impacted on masculinity and distress during the last week. Conclusions Men are not able to clearly identify the challenges prostate cancer brings especially changes to their masculinity. Relevance to clinical practice The findings strongly suggest that for men with prostate cancer, nursing assessments of men's sexual health be augmented by information gained from their partners; further, these assessments should be augmented with a careful exploration of these men's psyche guided by the knowledge that masculinity influences perceptions of self (being a man) and help seeking.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter K O'Shaughnessy & Colin Ireland & Lemuel Pelentsov & Laws A Thomas & Adrian J Esterman, 2013. "Impaired sexual function and prostate cancer: a mixed method investigation into the experiences of men and their partners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3492-3502, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3492-3502
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catharina Frid Annerstedt & Stinne Glasdam, 2019. "Nurses' attitudes towards support for and communication about sexual health—A qualitative study from the perspectives of oncological nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3556-3566, October.
    2. Valentina Bressan & Annamaria Bagnasco & Giuseppe Aleo & Fiona Timmins & Michela Barisone & Monica Bianchi & Ramona Pellegrini & Loredana Sasso, 2017. "Mixed‐methods research in nursing – a critical review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2878-2890, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3492-3502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.