IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3160-3169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational regulation theory and the role of social support and organisational fairness for nurses in a general acute context

Author

Listed:
  • John Rodwell
  • Louise Munro

Abstract

Aims and objectives To present a novel approach to nurse stress by exploring the demand–control–support model with organisational justice through the lens of relational regulation theory. Background Nursing is often stressful due to high demands and dissatisfaction with pay, which impacts the mental well‐being and productivity of nurses. Design A cross‐sectional design. Methods A validated questionnaire was sent to the work addresses of all nursing and midwifery staff in a medium‐sized general acute hospital in Australia. A total of 190 nurses and midwives returned completed questionnaires for the analyses. Results The multiple regression analyses demonstrated that the model applies to the prototypical context of a general acute hospital and that job control, supervisor support and outside work support improve the job satisfaction and mental health of nurses. Conclusions Most importantly, supervisor support was found to buffer the impact of excessive work demands. Fairness of procedures, distribution of resources and the quality and consistency of information are also beneficial. Relational regulation theory is applied to these findings as a novel way to conceptualise the mechanisms of support and fairness in nursing. Relevance to clinical practice The importance of nurses' well‐being and job satisfaction is a priority for improving clinical outcomes. Practically, this means nurse managers should be encouraging nurses in the pursuit of diverse relational activities both at work and outside work.

Suggested Citation

  • John Rodwell & Louise Munro, 2013. "Relational regulation theory and the role of social support and organisational fairness for nurses in a general acute context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3160-3169, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3160-3169
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12385
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gokce Basbug & Ayn Cavicchi & Susan S. Silbey, 2023. "Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Laboratory Safety Is a Persistent Challenge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 571-587, May.
    2. Sophia H Hu & Ya‐Mei Yu & Wen‐Yin Chang & Yen‐Kuang Lin, 2018. "Social support and factors associated with self‐efficacy among acute‐care nurse practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 876-882, February.
    3. Camelia López-Deflory & Amélie Perron & Margalida Miró-Bonet, 2021. "Organisational Justice and Political Agency among Nurses in Public Healthcare Organisations: A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Willoughby Moloney & Jessica Fieldes & Stephen Jacobs, 2020. "An Integrative Review of How Healthcare Organizations Can Support Hospital Nurses to Thrive at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3160-3169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.