IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i1-2p192-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family members’ perceptions of the nursing bedside handover

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Tobiano
  • Wendy Chaboyer
  • Anne McMurray

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore families’ perceptions of shift‐to‐shift bedside handover. Background. The potential role families can play in bedside handover is unknown. Understanding family members’ perceptions can provide a foundation for nurses to tailor their bedside handover to family members’ perceptions, encouraging their involvement and potentially improving patient care. Design. Qualitative study, using case study methodology. Methods. The study was conducted with eight family members in one rehabilitation ward in Queensland, Australia, in 2009. Data included observations of bedside handover, field notes and in‐depth interviews. Thematic analysis of data was conducted to identify unique and common themes indicative of family perceptions. Results. Three major themes emerged. The first, understanding the situation, consisted of three subthemes: feeling informed, understanding the patient’s condition and understanding patient’s treatment. The second theme was interacting with nursing staff, with five subthemes, including sharing information, clarifying information, assisting in care, asking questions and interpreting for the patient. The final subtheme was finding value, which contained five subthemes: feeling at ease, feeling included, valuing individualisation, preparing for the future and maintaining patient privacy. Conclusions. Bedside handover provides an opportunity to involve family members in patient care and promote family‐centred care core concepts. Family members value the chance to participate and can ultimately improve the accuracy of handover communication. Relevance to clinical practice. Bedside handover is beneficial for nurses, patients and family members and embodies patient and family‐centred care. Managers should consider its implementation in hospitals, developing strategies such as standard operating protocols for a more family inclusive approach to communication. Nurses may require further training to best undertake bedside handover and involve family members in care. The study suggests expansion of research into this important area of family‐centred care.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Tobiano & Wendy Chaboyer & Anne McMurray, 2013. "Family members’ perceptions of the nursing bedside handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 192-200, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:192-200
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04212.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04212.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04212.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary F. Forde & Alice Coffey & Josephine Hegarty, 2020. "Bedside handover at the change of nursing shift: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3731-3742, October.
    2. Benjamin R Mackie & Andrea Marshall & Marion Mitchell, 2018. "Acute care nurses' views on family participation and collaboration in fundamental care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2346-2359, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:192-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.