IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i23-24p3392-3401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of patient safety culture in the causation of unintended events in hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Marleen Smits
  • Cordula Wagner
  • Peter Spreeuwenberg
  • Danielle RM Timmermans
  • Gerrit van der Wal
  • Peter P Groenewegen

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine whether the relationship between specialty and patient safety is mediated by safety culture. Background. Research has shown that patient safety in hospitals varies by specialty. The safety culture among healthcare professionals in hospital units is believed to influence safety performance. If there is a mediation effect of safety culture in the relationship between specialty and safety, then safety culture could explain why units vary in performance. Design. Cross‐sectional observational study in 28 units of 20 hospitals in the Netherlands. Units were of three specialties: emergency medicine, surgery and internal medicine. Methods. Safety culture was measured with the Dutch version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture with 11 culture dimensions (n = 542; response 56%). Safety outcomes were types of unintended events (six types). Unintended events were collected through staff reporting (n = 1885 events). Data were examined using multilevel regression analysis. Results. The overall safety culture in the units did not mediate the relationship between specialty and the safety outcomes (event types), but three of the 11 dimensions showed significant mediation on one or more event types: non‐punitive response to error, hospital management support and willingness to report. Conclusions. Only a few safety culture dimensions mediated the relationship between specialty and some of the outcomes, with ‘willingness to report’ as the most important mediating factor. Our study did not give strong evidence that specialties differ in performance because of their safety cultures. More research into the causes of variation in patient safety between hospital units is needed. Relevance to clinical practice. Our study could not give support for the claim that safety culture is a key factor affecting patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Marleen Smits & Cordula Wagner & Peter Spreeuwenberg & Danielle RM Timmermans & Gerrit van der Wal & Peter P Groenewegen, 2012. "The role of patient safety culture in the causation of unintended events in hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3392-3401, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3392-3401
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04261.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04261.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04261.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre & Qazi, Abroon & Alalami, Mohammad Amjad & Ellahham, Samer & Ozonoff, Al, 2020. "Evaluation of patient safety culture using a random forest algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Susanna Tella & Nancy‐Jane Smith & Pirjo Partanen & David Jamookeeah & Marja‐Leena Lamidi & Hannele Turunen, 2015. "Learning to ensure patient safety in clinical settings: comparing Finnish and British nursing students’ perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2954-2964, October.
    3. Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre & Rodrigues, Clarence & Qazi, Abroon & Ellahham, Samer & Ozonoff, Al, 2021. "A comparative study of patient and staff safety evaluation using tree-based machine learning algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:23-24:p:3392-3401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.