IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i17-18p2499-2508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploration of the perceived changes in intimacy of patients’ relationships following head and neck cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn O’Brien
  • Brenda Roe
  • Christopher Low
  • Lorraine Deyn
  • Simon N Rogers

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper reports the experiences of former patients who have undergone a range of head and neck cancer treatments and their perceptions of the changes in intimacy experienced, as an individual and through their relationships with partners, family and friends. Background. A diagnosis of head and neck cancer, subsequent surgical treatment and radiotherapy can lead to an altered quality of life. Whilst important developments have been made to improve the quality of life for this patient group from a functional perspective, psychosocial perspectives are much less understood. Design. A qualitative study approach. Methods. Data were collected in 2007/2008 via interview using open‐ended questions from a purposive sample of 16 participants who were at least one year post‐treatment. A thematic analysis was employed to interpret the findings. Results. Analysis of the data produced three broad themes. These were ‘personal identity’, ‘re‐establishing social networks’ and ‘intimate relationships’ and explored the person as an individual and their perceived changes to self‐esteem and image. The perception of their altered position in society, the impact this has on their willingness to re‐engage with society and the degree to which treatment can alter an individual’s ability to resume former intimate relationships with family and partners. Conclusion. Patients’ definitions of intimacy are multifaceted and related directly to the type of relationship that existed prior to treatment. The concerns and challenges faced by patients need to be addressed and support opportunities considered as part of the rehabilitation process. Relevance to clinical practice. The paper gives insight for nurses and other healthcare professionals who are expected to provide effective emotional and therapeutic support for patients who have undergone treatment for head and neck cancer. Understanding of patient concerns and recognition of adaptive and coping strategies are essential for this practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn O’Brien & Brenda Roe & Christopher Low & Lorraine Deyn & Simon N Rogers, 2012. "An exploration of the perceived changes in intimacy of patients’ relationships following head and neck cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2499-2508, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2499-2508
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04162.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04162.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04162.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Myles Balfe & Katie O'Brien & Aileen Timmons & Phyllis Butow & Eleanor O' Sullivan & Rachael Gooberman‐Hill & Linda Sharp, 2016. "The unmet supportive care needs of long‐term head and neck cancer caregivers in the extended survivorship period," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1576-1586, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:17-18:p:2499-2508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.