IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i1-2p232-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informal stroke caregivers’ self‐appraised problem‐solving abilities as a predictor of well‐being and perceived social support

Author

Listed:
  • May H‐L Lui
  • Diana TF Lee
  • Nan Greenwood
  • Fiona M Ross

Abstract

Aim. To describe the relationship between self‐appraised problem‐solving abilities and psychological distress, burden and perceived social support in informal, family stroke caregivers. Background. Previous research suggests that self‐appraised problem‐solving abilities play a significant role in the well‐being of family caregivers of patients with chronic illness. However, little is known about its role in caregivers of stroke survivors. Design. Prospective correlational study. Methods. One week before discharge, 103 family caregivers of survivors of a first stroke were assessed for their perceived problem‐solving abilities, social support, anxiety, depression and physical well‐being. At three months postdischarge, 85 of these caregivers (83% retention) were reassessed on the same measures. In addition, their levels of burden and perceived difficulties were also measured. Results. Using multiple regression, overall self‐appraised problem‐solving abilities and its subscale ‘confidence in problem‐solving’ at one week before discharge were significant predictors of caregiver perceived social support (R2 = 29%) and perceived physical well‐being (R2 = 42%) at three months postdischarge. Other relationships were non‐significant. Conclusions. Caregivers’ perceived social support and physical well‐being were significantly predicted by confidence in problem‐solving. Relevance to clinical practice. This study is timely given the challenges facing health systems in Hong Kong to effectively manage chronic illness through family‐centred care. The significant relationships between caregiver self‐appraised problem‐solving, perceived social support and well‐being suggest that interventions maximising caregiver confidence in problem‐solving might be valuable in supporting family caregivers of stroke survivors. Nurses working with families caring for stroke survivors both close to discharge and in the early transition stages back at home may be in an ideal position to offer this support.

Suggested Citation

  • May H‐L Lui & Diana TF Lee & Nan Greenwood & Fiona M Ross, 2012. "Informal stroke caregivers’ self‐appraised problem‐solving abilities as a predictor of well‐being and perceived social support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1‐2), pages 232-242, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:232-242
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03742.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03742.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03742.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucinda J. Graven & Shamra Boel-Studt & Harleah G. Buck & Laurie Abbott & Joan S. Grant, 2021. "Heart Failure Caregiver Self-Care: A Latent Class Analysis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(5), pages 625-635, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:232-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.