IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i7-8p1188-1195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient safety culture: an Italian experience

Author

Listed:
  • Annamaria Bagnasco
  • Laura Tibaldi
  • Paola Chirone
  • Clara Chiaranda
  • Maria Stella Panzone
  • Domenico Tangolo
  • Giuseppe Aleo
  • Luciana Lazzarino
  • Loredana Sasso

Abstract

Aims. To understand what level of awareness health professionals working in a hospital of Northern Italy had of the patient safety culture by using the Italian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire and also validate its use in this setting. Background. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire was developed by the Agency for Health Research and Quality in 2008 and validated by several studies. Therefore, we decided to test the Italian version of this tool to see if it could be used effectively to measure and appraise patient safety culture also in Italy. Design. Survey. Methods. To check the validity of the questionnaire, we applied the continued comparison and the global data treatment methods. Results. Of the 1008 questionnaires we administered, 724 (71%) were returned. The majority of the questions were answered (mean 98, SD 3·4%). From a Chi‐square test on the consistency of the answers, we found that six of the 12 perspectives we explored had a high level of significance, whereas in the other six, the differences in the answers were just casual. Conclusions. The Italian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire allowed us to assess health professionals’ awareness of patient safety culture and thus validate the effectiveness of this tool. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings of our survey could be useful to design an objective tool that would allow the five health professional groups involved in the study (directors/coordinators, physicians, nurses/midwives, physiotherapists and technicians) gain a better knowledge of the patient safety culture and thus improve the quality of clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Annamaria Bagnasco & Laura Tibaldi & Paola Chirone & Clara Chiaranda & Maria Stella Panzone & Domenico Tangolo & Giuseppe Aleo & Luciana Lazzarino & Loredana Sasso, 2011. "Patient safety culture: an Italian experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1188-1195, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:7-8:p:1188-1195
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03377.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03377.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03377.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulmajeed Azyabi & Waldemar Karwowski & Mohammad Reza Davahli, 2021. "Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Hospital Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-36, March.
    2. Indre Brasaite & Marja Kaunonen & Arvydas Martinkenas & Vida Mockiene & Tarja Suominen, 2017. "Health Care Professionals’ Knowledge Regarding Patient Safety," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 285-300, June.
    3. Eva María Sosa-Palanca & Carlos Saus-Ortega & Vicente Gea-Caballero & Joaquín Andani-Cervera & Pedro García-Martínez & Rafael Manuel Ortí-Lucas, 2022. "Nurses’ Perception of Patient Safety Culture in a Referral Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre & Rodrigues, Clarence & Qazi, Abroon & Ellahham, Samer & Ozonoff, Al, 2021. "A comparative study of patient and staff safety evaluation using tree-based machine learning algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:7-8:p:1188-1195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.