IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i23-24p3477-3484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process of ambivalent normalisation: experience of family caregivers of elders with mild cognitive impairment in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Li‐Min Kuo
  • Yea‐Ing L Shyu

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To conceptualise the caregiving process in Taiwanese families caring for elders with mild cognitive impairment. Background. Family caregivers play an essential role in the lives of elders with mild cognitive impairment by dealing with their cognitive status and daily function. Little is known, however, about the development of the caregiving trajectory, particularly in Asian countries. Design and methods. Grounded theory methodology was used. Data were collected via in‐depth interviews with 10 family caregivers of patients with mild cognitive impairment and living at home in northern Taiwan. Data were analysed by constant comparative analysis. Results. The process most used by family caregivers to adjust to conflicts and changes in relationships with elders with mild cognitive impairment was ‘ambivalent normalisation’. This dynamic process included three components: subtle changes, optimistic appraisal and ambivalent anticipation. Family caregivers who had developed this process were more likely to adopt multiple effective behavioural approaches to avoid conflict in their daily life and to begin outlining future caregiving tasks. Conclusions. The process of ambivalent normalisation can sensitise healthcare providers to family caregivers’ needs and provide a basis for developing frameworks for future substantive theory and possible future research. Relevance to clinical practice. This study’s findings may help healthcare providers understand family caregivers’ needs and effective patterns for taking care of elders with mild cognitive impairment. Interventions can be developed to facilitate family caregivers’ awareness of the changes in their loved one in the initial stage of diagnosis and adopt multiple effective strategies to prevent conflicts in their lives. Healthcare providers can actively examine the cognitive function of older people in general outpatient departments, provide well‐timed treatments and minimise caregiver burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Li‐Min Kuo & Yea‐Ing L Shyu, 2010. "Process of ambivalent normalisation: experience of family caregivers of elders with mild cognitive impairment in Taiwan," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3477-3484, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3477-3484
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03240.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03240.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03240.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanshan Wang & Daphne Sze Ki Cheung & Angela Yee Man Leung & Patricia M. Davidson, 2020. "Factors associated with caregiving appraisal of informal caregivers: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3201-3221, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3477-3484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.