IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1645-1653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perception of nursing workforce and its impact on the managerial outcomes in emergency departments

Author

Listed:
  • Yi‐Chun Hu
  • Jih‐Chang Chen
  • Hsiao‐Ting Chiu
  • Hsi‐Che Shen
  • Wen‐Yin Chang

Abstract

Aims. (1) To understand nurses’ subjective perceptions of the current nursing workforce in their emergency departments, (2) to examine the relationship between nurses’ workforce perceptions and its impact on the managerial outcomes and (3) to analyse the correlation between nurses’ characteristics and the scores on workforce perception. Background. While the association between workforce perceptions and nurse outcomes is well‐documented, few studies have examined how emergency department nurses perceive current workforce and related outcomes. Design. A cross‐sectional questionnaire survey. Method. A self‐reported workforce perception questionnaire was used to survey 538 registered nurses in the emergency departments of 19 hospitals in northern Taiwan, during May to October 2006. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi‐square test, independent t‐test, Pearson correlation and one‐way anova. Results. The mean score of workforce perception was 6·28 points (total = 10 points). Both overtime (p = 0·02) and number of callbacks on days off (p = 0·01) were significantly correlated to current nursing workforce and hospital level. Older nurses tended to have more emergency department experience (r = 0·37; p = 0·01) and those with more emergency department experience tended to have vacation accumulation (r = 0·09; p = 0·04), overtime (r = 0·10; p = 0·03) and better perception of their emergency department’s current workforce (r = 0·09; p = 0·05). Conclusions. Although nurses’ perceptions were found to be only moderate, overtime and number of callbacks on days off are potential problems that should be addressed by nursing leaders to benefit future emergency nurses. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings can help drive strategies to ensure adequate staffing, to stabilise the nursing workforce and to prevent nurses from burnout factors such as working long hours, unpredictable schedules and a stressful work environment that may impact both the quality of emergency care and the quality of the nurses’ work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi‐Chun Hu & Jih‐Chang Chen & Hsiao‐Ting Chiu & Hsi‐Che Shen & Wen‐Yin Chang, 2010. "Nurses’ perception of nursing workforce and its impact on the managerial outcomes in emergency departments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1645-1653, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1645-1653
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02999.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02999.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02999.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rose Chapman & Asheq Rahman & Mary Courtney & Cheyne Chalmers, 2017. "Impact of teamwork on missed care in four Australian hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 170-181, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1645-1653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.