IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i3p272-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse consultants: organizational influences on role achievement

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie A Woodward
  • Christine Webb
  • Morag Prowse

Abstract

Aims. This paper reports on organizational influences on nurse consultant post holders. The influence of individual characteristics has been the subject of another paper. Background. Nurse consultant posts were set up in the United Kingdom from the late 1990s onwards and, therefore, there has been little opportunity to report on evaluations of these innovative initiatives. Design. A cross‐sectional design, using a convenience sample, was adopted. Methods. Ten nurse consultants working in a variety of settings and specialties participated in in‐depth, tape‐recorded interviews. The data were analysed using the Framework approach. Findings. Support systems were important influences on nurse consultants’ role achievement levels. These took the form of internal trust networks, nurse consultant forums and links with higher education institutions. Post holders both gave and received support and acted to empower other nurses. Thus, relationships were vital to successful role integration. The culture and structures of the National Health System were also a powerful influence in terms of local and national modernization policies, and participants had to be careful in their choice of strategies to deal with the traditional medically dominated culture. Conclusions. The new nurse consultant role is challenging and innovative, but a major area of contention is how much post holders are expected to take on work previously done by doctors rather than developing their nursing role. Organizational support and commitment are needed if nurse consultants are to maximize the benefits of this innovation. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings show that new nursing roles are not always easily accepted in multidisciplinary settings and that holders of such post need to have the appropriate previous knowledge, skills and personal characteristics, as well as the ability to negotiate their way through organizational influences.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie A Woodward & Christine Webb & Morag Prowse, 2006. "Nurse consultants: organizational influences on role achievement," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 272-280, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:272-280
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01295.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01295.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01295.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krista Jokiniemi & Anna‐Maija Pietilä & Jari Kylmä & Kaisa Haatainen, 2012. "Advanced nursing roles: A systematic review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 421-431, September.
    2. Helen Franks, 2014. "The contribution of nurse consultants in England to the public health leadership agenda," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3434-3448, December.
    3. Christine Atsalos & Karen Biggs & Sabine Boensch & Fiona Lee Gavegan & Susan Heath & Marlene Payk & Grace Trapolini, 2014. "How clinical nurse and midwifery consultants optimise patient care in a tertiary referral hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2874-2885, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:272-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.