IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i10p1240-1246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfied patients are also vulnerable patients – narratives from an acute care ward

Author

Listed:
  • Venke Sørlie
  • Kirsti Torjuul
  • Anita Ross
  • Mona Kihlgren

Abstract

Aim. To illuminate the experience of being a patient and cared for in an acute care ward. Background. Patients may be the best source of information for assessing the quality of care in acute care wards. Studies often show that patients’ satisfaction with their hospital stay is interpreted by managers and care providers as a measure for quality of care. Design. Ten patients were interviewed as part of a comprehensive investigation by four researchers into the narratives of five enrolled nurses (study No. 1 – published in Nursing Ethics 2004), five Registered Nurses (study No. 2 published in Nursing Ethics 2005) and 10 patients (study No. 3) about their experiences from an acute care ward at one university hospital in Sweden. Method. A phenomenological hermeneutical method (inspired by the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur) was conducted in all three studies. Findings. The patients are very satisfied with their treatment and care. They also tell about factors that they do not consider as optimal, but which they explain as compromises, which must be accepted as a necessary part of their stay in the ward. This study demonstrates a close connection between patient satisfaction and vulnerability. Conclusions. It is important for all health care providers not to be complacent and satisfied when patients express their satisfaction with their treatment and care. This can result in losing the focus on the patients’ vulnerability and existential thoughts and reflections which are difficult for them, and which need to be addressed. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings can be seen as a challenge for the health care providers as well as the organization to provide quality of care to patients in acute care ward. When listening to the patients’ voice it makes it easier to be aware of the content of their vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Venke Sørlie & Kirsti Torjuul & Anita Ross & Mona Kihlgren, 2006. "Satisfied patients are also vulnerable patients – narratives from an acute care ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(10), pages 1240-1246, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:10:p:1240-1246
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01352.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01352.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01352.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanessa Heaslip & Sarah Hean & Jonathan Parker, 2018. "The etemic model of Gypsy Roma Traveller community vulnerability: is it time to rethink our understanding of vulnerability?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(17-18), pages 3426-3435, September.
    2. May Bazzi & Maud Lundèn & Karin Ahlberg & Ingegerd Bergbom & Mikael Hellström & Solveig M. Lundgren & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Patients’ lived experiences of waiting for and undergoing endovascular aortic repair in a hybrid operating room: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 810-820, March.
    3. Mukadder Mollaoğlu & Pelin Çelik, 2016. "Evaluation of emergency department nursing services and patient satisfaction of services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2778-2785, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:10:p:1240-1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.